Category: Farm practices complaint
-
Decision: McLeod and Lambeth v. Engqvist
Complaint related to noise from propane cannon and audible bird scare devices on a berry farm in Central Saanich.
-
Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. BC Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.
Complaint related to hours of operation, lights, and noise from a fruit processing plant. Complaint was referred to a hearing where jurisdiction and normal farm practices would be determined.
-
Decision: MacLeod d.b.a. Hold Fast Growers v. Mobbs d.b.a. Stave Falls Riding Stables
Complaint related to dust and light disturbance from an equestrian facility in Mission.
-
Decision: Lychowyd v. Washtock and Barkwill
Complaint related to dust, noise, odour, and manure management from horse operations in Summerland.
-
Preliminary decision: Lychowyd v. Washtock
Complaint related to odour from horse manure, dust from chain harrowing, and noise from skid steer operation. The hearing on these issues will proceed as scheduled despite the respondents’ request for adjournment.
-
Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.
Complaint related to noise, hours of operation, and lights from a fruit processing plant in Abbotsford. Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
-
Decision: Leveque and Others v. Tangaro
Complaint related to noise from bird scare devices used in a cherry orchard in Lake Country.
-
Decision: Latten v. Pomeroy
Complaint related to uncontained cattle and contaminated runoff from a cattle feedlot operation in Armstrong.
-
Preliminary decision: Lee v. Acre and Johnson
Complaint related to noise from barking dogs. Complaint dismissed as respondents were not operating a farm business under the FPPA.
-
Decision: Laxton, Lakeberg and McCarthy v. Dyck
Complaint related to dust, odour, noise, and other disturbances from a broiler operation in Lindell Beach. Issues included excessive dust from manure spreading, prolonged odour from manure storage, noise from farm operations, and concerns about biosecurity practices.