Category: Farm practices complaint
-
Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.
Complaint related to noise, hours of operation, and lights from a fruit processing plant in Abbotsford. Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
-
Decision: Leveque and Others v. Tangaro
Complaint related to noise from bird scare devices used in a cherry orchard in Lake Country.
-
Decision: Latten v. Pomeroy
Complaint related to uncontained cattle and contaminated runoff from a cattle feedlot operation in Armstrong.
-
Preliminary decision: Lee v. Acre and Johnson
Complaint related to noise from barking dogs. Complaint dismissed as respondents were not operating a farm business under the FPPA.
-
Decision: Laxton, Lakeberg and McCarthy v. Dyck
Complaint related to dust, odour, noise, and other disturbances from a broiler operation in Lindell Beach. Issues included excessive dust from manure spreading, prolonged odour from manure storage, noise from farm operations, and concerns about biosecurity practices.
-
Decision: Leal v. Gill
Complaint related to wind damage from a wind machine in a vineyard between Oliver and Osoyoos.
-
Decision: Judd v. Webber
Complaint related to noise from audio bird scare devices, use of machinery including helicopters, pesticide spraying and dust from a cherry orchard in Wynndel.
-
Preliminary decision: Judd v. Webber
Complaint related to water flow and pesticide use from a cherry orchard in Wynndel. The procedural decision addresses document exchange / disclosure and relevance of evidence for the upcoming hearing.
-
Decision: Jory v. Beacham
Complaint related to odour from barn reconfiguration and pest issues involving flies and rodents at a dairy farm in Black Creek. Multiple related complaints were placed in abeyance.
-
Preliminary decision: Jory v. Beacham
Complaint related to dust, diesel exhaust fumes and noise from truck and tractor traffic on a dairy farm in Black Creek. Multiple related complaints were dismissed as vexatious.