Type: Decision
-
Decision: Veeken’s Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s over-quota assessment decision to the British Columbia Marketing Board. Veeken’s Poultry Farm Ltd. contested the accuracy of a bird count conducted by the BCEMB, which led to an over-quota assessment. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s policy on quota credits and counting methods.
-
Decision: Way-Jac Holdings v. The British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision regarding shipment restrictions to the Lower Mainland. Way-Jac Holdings contested a threatened quota reduction if shipments were made before January 1, 1995. The decision was related to the Board’s letter dated July 12, 1993.
-
Decision: Vancouver Island Chicken Growers’ Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s removal of $0.01/lb premium for Vancouver Island producers established via Interim Order #196. The decision was related to the pricing order establishing a “one price system” for the regulated product.
-
Decision: Egg quota allocation
The B.C. Marketing Board issued directives to the B.C. Egg Marketing Board (BCEMB) regarding egg quota allocations, emphasizing the need for regional and specialty production adjustments. BCMB directed the establishment of a Market Responsive Allocation Pool and Temporary Restricted Licence Quota.
-
Preliminary decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The appellant requested a stay of a flock seizure notice pending the appeal hearing.
-
Decision: Samsom’s Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to enforce payment of outstanding levies and address allegations of fraud. Samsom’s Poultry Farm Ltd. contested the Board’s actions related to non-payment of judgment and levies, breach of agreement, and handling of surplus product. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s Standing Order.
-
Procedural Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The document addresses a procedural decision regarding the appeal of the BCEMB’s decision to seize a flock. The appellant challenges the seizure based on special circumstances and seeks legitimization of their operation.
-
Decision: Van Nuys v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision regarding the allocation of Temporary Restricted Licence Quota. The appellant contends that the appeal was filed within the 30-day period mandated by the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act, despite mailing delays. The decision was related to the allocation of temporary restricted licence quota production.
-
Decision: Van Nuys d.b.a. Van Nuys Farms v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny a permit for free run egg production under the Temporary Restricted Licence Quota (TRLQ) Program.
-
Procedural Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The document addresses a preliminary application in an appeal concerning the BCEMB’s decision to seize a flock. The BCEMB requested dismissal of the appeal as frivolous, vexatious, or trivial, citing a similar resolved appeal. The Panel decided the appeal should proceed to a hearing to determine its merits.