Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Procedural decision: : Olera Farms and Reid v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The document addresses a procedural decision regarding the admissibility of lay evidence in an appeal against the BCEMB’s decision on organic product marketing.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Original signed decision of appeal BCEMB’s decision to seize a flock due to alleged non-compliance with the BCEMB’s Standing Orders.
-
Decision: Reid and Olera Farms v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s enforcement decision to collect marketing licence fees. Appellants argued that certified organic eggs are not regulated under the Egg Scheme and challenged the retroactive collection of fees.
-
Decision: Reid d.b.a. Olera Farms v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to conduct a de novo hearing concerning the marketing of organic products. Appellant alleges legal error and arbitrariness by the BCEMB.
-
Procedural Decision: Reid d.b.a. Olera Farms v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Addresses preliminary issues in an appeal against the BCEMB’s decision to enforce its Standing Order on marketing regulated products. The decision discusses the admissibility of evidence for statutory interpretation and the bias claim.
-
Correspondence from BCFIRB: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
This correspondence addresses an appeal regarding a decision by the BCEMB concerning the seizure of a flock. The document discusses the routine nature of visits by BCEMB staff to egg production units under the British Columbia Egg Marketing Scheme, 1967.
-
Decision: Lewis v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny exemption from a 5% quota surrender requirement. The decision was related to section 9(i) of the Standing Order.
-
Decision: Morningside Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to assume ownership of eggs, implement an electronic deposit system, and address levy transparency. Morningside Farms Ltd. challenged the BCEMB’s actions regarding egg ownership, levy transparency, and freight levy charges.
-
Decision: Livingston Eggs Co. Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to refuse Livingston Eggs Co. Ltd.’s claims for price adjustments under the Ship Chandlers Claims Program. Livingston Eggs Co. Ltd. argued the decision was unfair and improperly handled.
-
Preliminary decision: Reid d.b.a. Olera Farms v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The BC Farm Industry Review Board considered a request for adjournment by the appellant regarding an appeal against the BCEMB’s decision on organic product marketing. The adjournment was requested due to a scheduling conflict with a trial. The BCMB granted the adjournment to June 10-17, 2002.