Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: Alverez et al. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCMMB’s decision to refuse restoration of licenses and quotas, and to grant MSQ to appellants. The appellants challenged the refusal to restore licenses and fluid quotas, and the denial of MSQ allocation, related to milk production and quota management.
-
Decision: Mitchell v. Bhullar d.b.a. Bhullar Farm Produce
Complaint related to noise from propane cannons used for bird control on a blueberry farm in Langley.
-
Decision: Materi v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Summary dismissal of appeal of BCEMB’s decision to revoke Materi’s layer quota allotment of 500 birds. Materi argued that the BCEMB’s seizure of over-quota birds prevented him from using his quota.
-
Decision: Materi v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to revoke Materi’s layer quota allotment. The appellant alleged a mistake in the Summary Dismissal Decision and requested reconsideration under Rule 22. Panel declined to correct or clarify under Rule 22 (no clerical or jurisdictional error); held reconsideration improper and panel functionally exhausted.
-
Decision: Lychowyd v. Washtock and Barkwill
Complaint related to dust, noise, odour, and manure management from horse operations in Summerland.
-
Preliminary decision: Lychowyd v. Washtock
Complaint related to odour from horse manure, dust from chain harrowing, and noise from skid steer operation. The hearing on these issues will proceed as scheduled despite the respondents’ request for adjournment.
-
Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.
Complaint related to noise, hours of operation, and lights from a fruit processing plant in Abbotsford. Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
-
Preliminary decision: Lee v. Acre and Johnson
Complaint related to noise from barking dogs. Complaint dismissed as respondents were not operating a farm business under the FPPA.
-
Decision: Laxton, Lakeberg and McCarthy v. Dyck
Complaint related to dust, odour, noise, and other disturbances from a broiler operation in Lindell Beach. Issues included excessive dust from manure spreading, prolonged odour from manure storage, noise from farm operations, and concerns about biosecurity practices.
-
Decision: Lancaster v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to set a milk hauling rate for Lancaster’s Walhachin farm. Lancaster contended that BCMMB failed to grandfather the existing rate from 2004 and did not amend a milk hauling zone boundary to include his farm.