Industry: Table egg
-
Consent Order: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The British Columbia Marketing Board issued a consent order extending the deadline for the appellants to maintain up to 2400 layers from December 31, 1989, to January 31, 1990, while keeping all other aspects of the original decision unchanged.
-
Decision: Cedardale Poultry Ranch Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny levy abatement. Cedardale Poultry Ranch Ltd. sought abatement due to flock cycle adjustment requested by its buyer, Lucerne Foods Ltd. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s Uniform Levy System policy.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to enforce an order for the seizure and disposal of layers. The decision was related to an order of the British Columbia Marketing Board dated June 6, 1989, and a Consent Order of December 22, 1989.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to authorize the seizure and disposal of layers exceeding the allowable unregulated limit.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Digital copy of decision regarding appeal of BCEMB’s decision to seize a flock due to alleged non-compliance with the BCEMB’s Standing Orders.
-
Position description: Chair of the B.C. Egg Marketing Board
Outlines the role, responsibilities, and required competencies of the BCEMB chair.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision concerning a flock seizure. Pottruff challenged the seizure of his flock due to alleged special circumstances, including the BCEMB’s prior awareness and implicit permission of his activities. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s Standing Orders and the management of specialty egg production.
-
Decision: Kleine v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to seize eggs and layers for contravention of standing orders. The decision was related to the issuance of licenses under the standing orders.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to commence a Supreme Court action to recover unpaid marketing licence fees.
-
Decision: Anderson v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to charge levies to the appellants. The appellants argued against paying market licensing fees, claiming lack of representation and benefits.