Type: Decision
-
Preliminary decision: Stremler v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the dismissal of an appeal due to the appellant’s failure to submit the required filing fee within the specified timeframe.
-
Decision: Vancouver Island Produce Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s supervisory decision to terminate the Agency Application Process. Vancouver Island Produce Ltd. challenged the process’s legal authority, procedural fairness, and policy justification. The decision was related to the “Supervisory Review of Regulated Vegetable Production on Vancouver Island – Agency Application Process 2017 Crop Year.”
-
Preliminary decision: Pepper v. MacDonald
Complaint related to noise from chickens and roosters, dust, and water runoff from a poultry operation in Princeton. BCFIRB found the complaint about noise, dust, and runoff was connected to a farm business and referred the matter to a panel for a full hearing.
-
Procedural decision: Jacobsen v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Procedural decision regarding BCMMB’s application for summary dismissal of Jacobsen’s appeal regarding the raw milk hauling rate. Jacobsen argues that BCMMB should honor a 2008 determination of a $100 fee for milk transportation via Highway 97. The BCMMB’s application for summary dismissal was denied, allowing the appeal to proceed to a full hearing.
-
Preliminary decision: Harrison v. Jaeger
Complaint related to noise from a barking dog on a sheep farm in Grand Forks.
-
Decision: Viitre v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Vancouver due to physical abuse, including striking and harsh handling, and the dog’s resulting fear and distress. The appellant had a history of using forceful training methods with previous dogs.
-
Decision: Zhou v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 67 cats and 15 dogs in Surrey due to conditions including inadequate veterinary care, unsanitary living conditions, and severe infestations of ringworm, upper respiratory infections, and giardia. The animals were housed in overcrowded and poorly ventilated spaces, with inadequate biosecurity measures and insufficient staffing to provide necessary care.
-
Decision: City of Abbotsford v. Kapoor
Complaint related to dust from lack of crop cover on a vegetable farm in Abbotsford.
-
Costs decision: Zhou v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of costs regarding the seizure of 65 cats and 15 dogs in Surrey due to conditions including contagious illnesses among cats and ringworm in dogs, requiring specialized care and quarantine.