Type: Decision
-
Decision: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny MPL’s request for an extension of the deadline for greenhouse vegetable producers to transfer agencies. MPL argued the denial effectively rejected their application for a Class 1 Agency designation for the 2021 growing season. The decision was related to the BCVMC’s grower transfer policy.
-
Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — interim orders
The BCFIRB issued interim orders restricting the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission’s activities during the supervisory review into allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity. The orders prevent certain commissioners from participating in decisions affecting Prokam, CFP and MPL.
-
Decision: Smith v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding six thoroughbred horses in Mission due to conditions including inadequate shelter, deep mud, lack of food and water, and untreated medical issues such as muscular atrophy, rain scald, and hoof problems.
-
Decision: Andrusek v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding five dogs and five birds due to unsanitary living conditions, including exposure to feces, garbage, and high ammonia levels, and untreated medical issues such as flea infestations, matted fur and dental disease.
-
Preliminary decision: Solbakken v. Jolivet
Complaint related to noise and odour from manure management practices at a neighbouring farm in Saanichton. Water quality issues were not within BCFIRB’s jurisdiction. The complaint will still proceed to a hearing on the remaining issues.
-
Decision: Chandler v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding four dogs, two goats, and one cat in Quesnel due to unsanitary living conditions, untreated medical issues including a goat with a broken leg and a dog with dental problems, and inadequate veterinary care.
-
Preliminary decision: Davison v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
An appeal concerning the seizure of one dog. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s withdrawal.
-
Preliminary decision: Edward v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding late filing of an appeal. The appeal was dismissed as it was filed after the deadline, with no discretion for time extension.
-
Decision: Currall v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding one dog in Ladysmith due to inadequate nutrition, poor living conditions, and lack of veterinary care, including untreated dental issues and insufficient shelter.
-
Decision: Balcilek v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 77 cats in Squamish due to inadequate space, poor ventilation, unsanitary conditions, and untreated medical issues including eye, nose, and ear discharges, and reproductive concerns. The cats were kept in two motorhomes with high ammonia levels and insufficient litter boxes.