Type: Decision
-
Decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. BCVMC — Appeals #N1908 and #N2101
BCFIRB issues a decision on the appeals by Prokam Enterprises Ltd. against the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission regarding licensing and marketing directives. The decision addresses the live issues in Appeal #N1908, and dismisses Appeal #N2101 due to lack of an appealable decision.
-
Procedural decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
The decision addresses whether there are unresolved issues in appeals deferred during a supervisory review, and considers the BCVMC’s application for summary dismissal of an earlier appeal. The appeals involve Prokam’s licensing and marketing directives under the General Marketing Agreement.
-
Decision: Magaw v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 40 dogs in Salmo due to conditions including inadequate shelter, unsanitary living conditions, lack of veterinary care and malnutrition. The dogs exhibited issues such as low body condition scores, dental disease and stereotypic behaviors. The appellant had a history of past complaints and non-compliance with care standards.
-
Decision: Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — Participation and interim orders
BCFIRB issues a decision regarding participation and interim orders in the supervisory review of allegations of bad faith and unlawful activities in the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission.
-
Procedural decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
An appeal of BCCMB pricing order #161 is deferred to be addressed by a supervisory panel as part of a supervisory review. The PPPABC can proceed with this and other deferred appeals after the supervisory process is completed.
-
Decision: Seddon v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 16 dogs in Pinantan Lake due to unsanitary living conditions, inadequate ventilation, and untreated medical issues including giardia, roundworm, and distemper. The appellant had a history of past seizures by the BC SPCA.
-
Procedural decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Procedural decision regarding an appeal of BCVMC’s reconsideration decision by Prokam Enterprises Ltd. The appeal concerns issues related to Prokam’s licence class and an interim order for storage crops marketing. The appeal was deferred pending the conclusion of a 2021 supervisory review addressing allegations of bad faith and unlawful conduct.
-
Decision: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny MPL’s request for an extension of the deadline for greenhouse vegetable producers to transfer agencies. MPL argued the denial effectively rejected their application for a Class 1 Agency designation for the 2021 growing season. The decision was related to the BCVMC’s grower transfer policy.
-
Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — interim orders
The BCFIRB issued interim orders restricting the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission’s activities during the supervisory review into allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity. The orders prevent certain commissioners from participating in decisions affecting Prokam, CFP and MPL.
-
Decision: Smith v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding six thoroughbred horses in Mission due to conditions including inadequate shelter, deep mud, lack of food and water, and untreated medical issues such as muscular atrophy, rain scald, and hoof problems.