Outcome: Approved
-
Decision: Livingston Eggs Co. Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to refuse Livingston Eggs Co. Ltd.’s claims for price adjustments under the Ship Chandlers Claims Program. Livingston Eggs Co. Ltd. argued the decision was unfair and improperly handled.
-
Preliminary decision: Reid d.b.a. Olera Farms v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The BC Farm Industry Review Board considered a request for adjournment by the appellant regarding an appeal against the BCEMB’s decision on organic product marketing. The adjournment was requested due to a scheduling conflict with a trial. The BCMB granted the adjournment to June 10-17, 2002.
-
Decision: Island Egg Sales Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny the transfer of specialty egg production to Island Egg Sales Ltd. The decision was related to the allocation of specialty egg production between grading stations.
-
Consent Order: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The British Columbia Marketing Board issued a consent order extending the deadline for the appellants to maintain up to 2400 layers from December 31, 1989, to January 31, 1990, while keeping all other aspects of the original decision unchanged.
-
Decision: Cedardale Poultry Ranch Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny levy abatement. Cedardale Poultry Ranch Ltd. sought abatement due to flock cycle adjustment requested by its buyer, Lucerne Foods Ltd. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s Uniform Levy System policy.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to enforce an order for the seizure and disposal of layers. The decision was related to an order of the British Columbia Marketing Board dated June 6, 1989, and a Consent Order of December 22, 1989.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to authorize the seizure and disposal of layers exceeding the allowable unregulated limit.
-
Decision: Kleine v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to seize eggs and layers for contravention of standing orders. The decision was related to the issuance of licenses under the standing orders.
-
Decision: Dams, Warcup and Ritter v. Daybreak Farms Ltd.
Complaint related to excessive flies from a layer farm in Terrace.
-
Decision: Hopcott and Middleton v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMB’s decision to adjust marketing allocations. The appellants challenged the Cranberry Board’s failure to implement the BCMB’s directive to increase their allocations.