Type: Decision
-
Decision: Zhang v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding two dogs in Vancouver due to conditions including being left outdoors for extended periods without access to shelter, food, or bedding, and being crated in a garage for long periods.
-
Dismissal: McCrea v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog. Appellant withdrew their appeal following agreement between parties.
-
Decision: St. Pierre v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Vancouver due to repeated exposure to abuse, including being kicked, punched and dragged, while the owner was unaware of the circumstances.
-
Decision: Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision to deny the request for custom kill priority days. Mark Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms argued that the decision was inconsistent with Ministry policy and BCFIRB directives. The decision was related to the establishment of custom processing services for direct marketers.
-
Decision: Bren-Den Ventures Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny an off-exchange quota transfer as part of a bona fide Going Concern Sale. Bren-Den Ventures Ltd. challenged the denial, arguing the sale met the necessary conditions. The decision was related to BCEMB’s Consolidated Order.
-
Preliminary decision: Mathews v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal concerning the seizure of two dogs. The appeal was dismissed following the appellants’ withdrawal of the appeal.
-
Decision: Regier Properties Ltd v. British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission
Appeal of BCBHEC’s decision to dismiss the appeal due to late filing. Regier Properties Ltd argued for reconsideration based on new information and exceptional circumstances affecting their farm. The decision was related to the March 31, 2023 decision and the statutory limitation period for appeals.
-
Decision: Kendall v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 13 dogs, 3 cats, 14 goats, 31 chickens, 1 dog, 1 cat, 2 snakes, 1 rabbit, 28 chickens, 4 ducks, 31 quail and 48 rats in Ladysmith due to insufficient veterinary care, lack of consistent, safe and appropriate shelter and inadequate daily care. The animals were kept in unsanitary conditions, contributing…
-
Dismissal: Crampton v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding two dogs and two cats. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s withdrawal.
-
Dismissal: Croteau v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s withdrawal.