Type: Decision
-
Decision: Kendall v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 13 dogs, 3 cats, 14 goats, 31 chickens, 1 dog, 1 cat, 2 snakes, 1 rabbit, 28 chickens, 4 ducks, 31 quail and 48 rats in Ladysmith due to insufficient veterinary care, lack of consistent, safe and appropriate shelter and inadequate daily care. The animals were kept in unsanitary conditions, contributing…
-
Dismissal: Crampton v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding two dogs and two cats. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s withdrawal.
-
Dismissal: Croteau v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s withdrawal.
-
Decision: Ivens v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding three dogs in Victoria due to unsanitary living conditions, lack of adequate grooming, and lack of medical attention, including untreated eye and dental issues.
-
Decision: B&L Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny relief from an overproduction levy for period A180. B&L Poultry Ltd. argued that exceptional circumstances, including avian influenza and previous flooding, impacted their production. The decision was related to the General Orders on overproduction levies.
-
Dismissal: Red Sun Farms v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to summarily dismiss a request to designate Red Sun Farms as an agency. The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant, leading to its dismissal.
-
Decision: Krug v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding three dogs in Kamloops due to conditions including being underweight, dirty coats, untreated medical issues such as a yeast infection, and evidence of abuse including being thrown over a fence.
-
Decision: Homeland Farms Ltd v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny relief from an overproduction levy. Homeland Farms argued that their overproduction was due to a force majeure event caused by a clerical error by the CFIA, leading to additional chicks being placed.
-
Decision: K&M Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny K&M Farms’ request to grow pasture production on leased land. K&M Farms argued the decision was inconsistent with government policy and BCFIRB directives. The decision was related to BCCMB’s new leased land policies.
-
Decision: Fleishman, Hoffmann, Lawrie, and Hrebicek v. Frind Estate Winery
Complaint related to noise disturbance from a chiller at a neighbouring winery in Kelowna.