Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision Summary: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia and BC Chicken Growers’ Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to implement a new pricing formula for live pricing of mainstream broiler chicken. The appellants challenged the decision’s consistency with sound marketing policy and procedural fairness. The decision was related to the pricing formula for periods A-151 to A-156.
-
Decision: Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny annualization of seasonal production. K&M Farms sought to annualize its pasture-raised chicken production to avoid penalties and maintain consistent production cycles. The decision was related to the BCCMB General Orders and the principles of orderly marketing.
-
Decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd and Thomas Fresh Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to issue cease and desist orders and revoke licenses. The appellants challenged the BCVMC’s authority to apply minimum pricing rules to interprovincial sales and alleged bias due to Commission members’ ties to BC Fresh.
-
Procedural decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. and Fresh v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Procedural decision regarding appellants’ request for document disclosure in their appeal against the BCVMC’s decisions, and issues of document redaction and relevance to the appeal’s context. The appeal concerns the BCVMC’s minimum pricing policy and its application.
-
Dismissal: Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to not direct Rossdown to continue processing services.
-
Procedural decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s pricing decision to implement a new pricing formula for the live price of chicken. The appellant sought a partial stay of the decision, arguing it would cause irreparable harm and affect the processor/grower relationship.
-
Decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. and Thomas Fresh Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to confirm cease and desist orders and revoke licenses, requiring Prokam to sign a grower marketing agreement with BCfresh. Prokam sought a stay of the decision pending appeal, arguing jurisdictional overreach and potential harm.
-
Decision: Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision refusing to direct Rossdown Farms & Natural Foods to provide primal cut services to K&M Farms. The appeal was related to the British Columbia Turkey Marketing Scheme and the need for custom processing services to support farm-differentiated products.
-
Decision: Van Ginkel d.b.a. V3 Farms, Skye Hi Farms Inc., W. Friesen, Bradner Farms, and Coastline Chicks v. British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission
Appeal of BCBHEC’s decision to seek prior approval for an exemption regulation. Appellants argued the issues were not adequately addressed in a supervisory decision. The decision was related to the regulation of specialty broiler hatching egg production.
-
BCFIRB Document disclosure practice directive
Sets out approved methods for parties to submit documents to BCFIRB, ensuring consistency, accessibility, and compliance under its statutory mandates.