Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: CFP Marketing Corporation v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to defer CFP’s agency application pending strategic and agency reviews. CFP argues procedural unfairness and seeks timely consideration. The decision was related to the BCVMC’s General Orders and the strategic planning process.
-
Procedural decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission (Duplicate)
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to defer further consideration of Prokam’s appeal. Prokam’s concerns about delay and request for interim relief were noted.
-
Decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia and BC Chicken Growers’ Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s interim pricing decision to implement a new pricing formula for live chicken for periods A-151 to A-156. The appellants challenged the decision on grounds of unsustainable pricing and alleged procedural unfairness.
-
Decision Summary: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia and BC Chicken Growers’ Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to implement a new pricing formula for live pricing of mainstream broiler chicken. The appellants challenged the decision’s consistency with sound marketing policy and procedural fairness. The decision was related to the pricing formula for periods A-151 to A-156.
-
Decision: Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny annualization of seasonal production. K&M Farms sought to annualize its pasture-raised chicken production to avoid penalties and maintain consistent production cycles. The decision was related to the BCCMB General Orders and the principles of orderly marketing.
-
Decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd and Thomas Fresh Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to issue cease and desist orders and revoke licenses. The appellants challenged the BCVMC’s authority to apply minimum pricing rules to interprovincial sales and alleged bias due to Commission members’ ties to BC Fresh.
-
Procedural decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. and Fresh v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Procedural decision regarding appellants’ request for document disclosure in their appeal against the BCVMC’s decisions, and issues of document redaction and relevance to the appeal’s context. The appeal concerns the BCVMC’s minimum pricing policy and its application.
-
Dismissal: Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to not direct Rossdown to continue processing services.
-
Procedural decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s pricing decision to implement a new pricing formula for the live price of chicken. The appellant sought a partial stay of the decision, arguing it would cause irreparable harm and affect the processor/grower relationship.
-
Decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. and Thomas Fresh Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to confirm cease and desist orders and revoke licenses, requiring Prokam to sign a grower marketing agreement with BCfresh. Prokam sought a stay of the decision pending appeal, arguing jurisdictional overreach and potential harm.