Type: Decision
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This procedural decision addresses the adjournment application by Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. and others regarding their appeal against the BCCMB’s August 15, 2000, regulations.
-
Interim Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s interim order #002 decision to set production allocation for period A-36. Appellants argue the production levels are too high and create confusion under new regulations.
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal regarding a request for production of documents-including drafts, communications, and economic assessments-relating to amendments in the August 15, 2000 Chicken Board regulations and export program.
-
Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s policy decision to revise export production program rules. Appellants objected to the lack of full grandfathering of barn space and the failure to set production standards.
-
Preliminary decision: Fehr & Friesen v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The decision addressed preliminary issues regarding the timeliness of appeals against the BCCMB’s August 15, 2000 regulations and a November 15, 2002 decision.
-
Interim Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This supplementary decision addresses document production in appeals against the August 15, 2000, regulations of the BCCMB.
-
Decision: Friesen and Fehr v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s policy decision to implement rules affecting permit terms, corporate ownership, and export issues. Appellants challenged the restrictions on permit growth, transferability, and export limitations under the August 2000 policy rules, which were related to the New Entrant, Niche Market, and Specialty Program.
-
Decision: Farmcrest Foods Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny Farmcrest Foods Ltd.’s request to increase its specialty permit from 5,000 to 10,000 birds per week to meet processing demands and maintain market viability. The decision was related to the New Entrant, Niche Market and Specialty Program policy.
-
Decision: British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Producers Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to not adjust the price of hatching eggs and to not appoint a pricing committee. The appellant sought an upward adjustment of hatching egg prices and the establishment of a pricing committee. The decision was related to the cost of production formula for hatching eggs.
-
Preliminary decision: BC Chicken Growers Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The BC Chicken Growers Association sought a stay of the BCCMB’s decision to remove the over-marketing levy for period A-53.