Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: City of Abbotsford v. Kapoor
Complaint related to dust from lack of crop cover on a vegetable farm in Abbotsford.
-
Decision: Keeping v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 124 animals in Horsefly due to inadequate nutrition, poor shelter, and lack of veterinary care. The animals, including cattle, sheep, llamas, pigs, chickens, and rabbits, were found in distress with issues such as malnutrition, unsanitary conditions, and untreated medical problems.
-
Decision: Wier v. Labrecque
Complaint related to the trespass of GMO plants and chemical overspray from a grain farm in Smithers.
-
Decision: Simans v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 88 animals, including 45 dogs, 18 cats, 1 rabbit, 1 quail, 1 red-eared slider turtle, 5 goats, 1 pot-bellied pig, 3 ducks, 3 sheep, 5 chickens and 5 pigeons in Langley due to conditions including inadequate nutrition, overcrowding, severe dental disease, and untreated medical issues.
-
Dismissal: W. Friesen, Skye Hi Farms Inc., Casey Van Ginkel DBA V3 Farms, Coastline & Bradner Farms v British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission
Appeal of BCBHEC’s Recommendation Report proposing to exempt Asian breeder producers from quota and price regulation, following BCFIRB’s March 29, 2016 order in the original Skye Hi decision. The appeal was dismissed as premature because no final decision had yet been issued.
-
Decision: Nagetaal v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny an exemption from the Cottage Industry Program eligibility rules. The appellant sought relief based on exceptional circumstances, arguing against the policy that restricts participation to those without prior quota ownership. The BCMMB maintained restrictions were required under BCFIRB’s Specialty Review directions.
-
Preliminary decision: Salam v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding late filing and non-payment of the required filing fee for an appeal of the seizure of 1 dog.
-
Preliminary decision: Wong v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed late and lacking the required filing fee.
-
Decision: Cross, Royal Columbian Poultry ULC, Royal Feather ULC, and Royal Greens Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission
Appeal of BCBHEC’s enforcement decision to suspend producer licenses for non-compliance with the Consolidated Orders. The appellants challenged the suspension related to the marketing of “breaker quality eggs” and the appropriateness of enforcement measures. The decision was related to the Consolidated Orders on marketing broiler hatching eggs.
-
Decision: Hayden and Kemp v. Island Sea Farms Inc.
Complaint related to noise, odour and debris from a shellfish harvesting operation on Cortes Island.