Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: Dutra v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny entry into the Graduated Entry Program. Alfred Dutra argued procedural unfairness, inconsistency with the Consolidated Order, and irrelevant personal considerations. The decision was related to the BCMMB’s Graduated Entry Program.
-
Decision: Vancouver Island Produce Ltd. (VIP) v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to dismiss Vancouver Island Produce Ltd.’s appeal. VIP challenged the BCVMC’s recommendations regarding agency structure and licensing on Vancouver Island, which were part of a supervisory process evaluating the regulation of vegetable production. The appeal was dismissed under sections 31(1)(c), (f), and (g) of the Administrative Tribunals Act.
-
Decision: Parker v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 18 cats and 2 horses in Roberts Creek due to inadequate shelter, unsanitary conditions, and untreated medical issues including dental disease, ear infections and lameness. Animals were kept in a shed with high ammonia and freezing temperatures; horses were stalled in deep manure.
-
Decision: 0802881 BC Ltd (Stasis Farms) v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to direct Stasis Farms to use its specialty quota for quota period A-145 to produce and ship specialty product for Wingtat Game Bird Packers Ltd. The appellant argued that the decision would lead to financial harm and disrupt existing market arrangements.
-
Procedural decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to implement a new pricing formula for the live price of chicken. The PPPABC argued the decision was inconsistent with sound marketing policy and would cause irreparable harm to the processing industry.
-
Decision: Harrison v. Jaeger
Complaint related to noise from a barking dog on a sheep farm in Grand Forks.
-
Decision: Marleau v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 23 farm animals and a dog in Vancouver due to conditions requiring removal and care by the BC SPCA. Both parties requested that BCFIRB reassess the care costs awarded in an earlier decision.
-
Decision: Moller v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 47 cats and 12 kittens in Chase due to unsanitary living conditions, inadequate food and water, poor ventilation, and overcrowding. The animals were kept in trailers with high ammonia levels, feces accumulation, and inadequate care, leading to distress and health risks.
-
Decision: Five-Fry Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to end the Market Growth Allowance (MGA) program. Five-Fry Farms Ltd. argued that the lack of transitional provisions resulted in unequal access to the program. The decision was related to the Market Growth Allowance program.
-
Decision: Woodcreek Farms et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to amend the New Entrant Program rules to create a quota matching program for mainstream new entrant growers. The appellants sought inclusion in the program to access mainstream quota, arguing procedural unfairness and discrimination against specialty growers. The decision was related to the New Entrant Program rules.