Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Interim Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This interim decision addresses the scope of the BCCMB’s statutory obligation to produce documents in an appeal of 2000 regulatory changes tied to the National Allocation Agreement.
-
Decision: High Plains Poultry Farm Ltd. and Greenbelt Estates Ltd. v. B.C. Chicken Marketing Board
The B.C. Marketing Board sets aside underproduction penalties against High Plains Poultry Farm Ltd. and Greenbelt Estates Ltd., finding BCCMB Order 313’s application ambiguous regarding winter production penalties. BCMB recommends reviewing Order 313 to improve clarity and align with intended policy objectives.
-
Decision: Hong d.b.a. Hong Lee Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny a specialty chicken production permit of 1500-birds/week. The appellant argued for grandfathering based on past production levels and market demand for “Buddhist” chicken. The decision was related to the New Entrant, Niche Market and Specialty Program regulations.
-
Decision: Flockstra v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny additional roaster quota issuance under Regulation No. 1 M-162-1981.
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal concerning a stay application of the new August 15, 2000 BCCMB regulations, specifically challenging revisions to the Export Program under Part 25.
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This procedural decision addresses the adjournment application by Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. and others regarding their appeal against the BCCMB’s August 15, 2000, regulations.
-
Interim Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s interim order #002 decision to set production allocation for period A-36. Appellants argue the production levels are too high and create confusion under new regulations.
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal regarding a request for production of documents-including drafts, communications, and economic assessments-relating to amendments in the August 15, 2000 Chicken Board regulations and export program.
-
Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s policy decision to revise export production program rules. Appellants objected to the lack of full grandfathering of barn space and the failure to set production standards.
-
Preliminary decision: Fehr & Friesen v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The decision addressed preliminary issues regarding the timeliness of appeals against the BCCMB’s August 15, 2000 regulations and a November 15, 2002 decision.