Category: Supervisory review
-
Decision: BCFIRB to BCCMB — Prior approval chicken interim pricing formula for A-175
BCFIRB approves a modified amendment to the interim pricing formula for periods A-175 and A-176, allowing partial recovery above the guardrail after accounting for Ontario grower margin changes.
-
Letter: Hunter Litigation Chambers to BCFIRB — Request for decision on CFP Marketing Corporation agency application
Counsel for Prokam Enterprises Ltd. requests BCFIRB to direct the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission to decide on CFP Marketing Corporation’s agency application by March 23, 2022, citing previous delays and orders.
-
Closing argument of the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission: Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity in the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission
BCVMC presents its closing argument addressing allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity. The commission argues that there is no cogent evidence supporting the serious allegations made by complainant participants, which are deemed speculative and unsubstantiated.
-
Letter: BCCMB to BCFIRB — Update on long-term chicken pricing Cost Recovery Model progress
BCCMB provides a progress report on the steps taken towards implementing its long-term chicken Cost Recovery Model.
-
Letter: BCBHEC to BC Broiler Hatching Egg Producers — Follow-up on new pricing framework implementation plan and start date
Following BCFIRB approval, BC Broiler Hatching Egg Commission informs stakeholders it will implement its new pricing framework starting period A-179, per PPAC feedback.
-
Draft Terms of Reference − MPL BC Agency Designation for Greenhouse Vegetables
BCFIRB outlines the draft terms of reference for considering the BCVMC’s recommendation to designate MPL BC as an agency to market regulated greenhouse vegetables.
-
Reply submissions of Prokam Enterprises Ltd..: Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. submits a written reply to the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission’s submissions, disputing claims of misconduct and regulatory breaches.
-
Reply argument of hearing counsel: Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity
Hearing counsel addresses procedural issues raised by Prokam and MPL, including criticisms of the supervisory review panel and the nature of the supervisory review process.
-
Reply transcript extract book: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. — Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. presents additional excerpts from testimony, including cross-examinations and exhibits discussing compliance issues, marketing plans and delivery allocations.
-
Reply submissions of MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc.: Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity
MPL BC Distributors Inc. submits a reply to the written submissions of Andre Solymosi and the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission respondents, addressing mischaracterizations of evidence and defending the credibility of Mr. Mastronardi’s testimony.