Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: Cedardale Poultry Ranch Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny levy abatement. Cedardale Poultry Ranch Ltd. sought abatement due to flock cycle adjustment requested by its buyer, Lucerne Foods Ltd. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s Uniform Levy System policy.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to enforce an order for the seizure and disposal of layers. The decision was related to an order of the British Columbia Marketing Board dated June 6, 1989, and a Consent Order of December 22, 1989.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to authorize the seizure and disposal of layers exceeding the allowable unregulated limit.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Digital copy of decision regarding appeal of BCEMB’s decision to seize a flock due to alleged non-compliance with the BCEMB’s Standing Orders.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to commence a Supreme Court action to recover unpaid marketing licence fees.
-
Decision: Anderson v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to charge levies to the appellants. The appellants argued against paying market licensing fees, claiming lack of representation and benefits.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision concerning a flock seizure. Pottruff challenged the seizure of his flock due to alleged special circumstances, including the BCEMB’s prior awareness and implicit permission of his activities. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s Standing Orders and the management of specialty egg production.
-
Decision: Kleine v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to seize eggs and layers for contravention of standing orders. The decision was related to the issuance of licenses under the standing orders.
-
Decision: Timmerman v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision to deny the transfer of turkey quota to the appellant. The appellant contested the decision based on the interpretation of quota regulations, specifically related to the BCTMB General Orders Section 7 and the Canada Income Tax Act.
-
Decision: Van der Wereld v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny additional roaster quota, who was not a registered grower by the required date. The decision was related to Regulation IIM-162-1981 “Roaster Quota Allocation.”