Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Digital copy of decision regarding appeal of BCEMB’s decision to seize a flock due to alleged non-compliance with the BCEMB’s Standing Orders.
-
Decision: Anderson v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to charge levies to the appellants. The appellants argued against paying market licensing fees, claiming lack of representation and benefits.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision concerning a flock seizure. Pottruff challenged the seizure of his flock due to alleged special circumstances, including the BCEMB’s prior awareness and implicit permission of his activities. The decision was related to the BCEMB’s Standing Orders and the management of specialty egg production.
-
Decision: Kleine v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to seize eggs and layers for contravention of standing orders. The decision was related to the issuance of licenses under the standing orders.
-
Decision: Timmerman v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision to deny the transfer of turkey quota to the appellant. The appellant contested the decision based on the interpretation of quota regulations, specifically related to the BCTMB General Orders Section 7 and the Canada Income Tax Act.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to commence a Supreme Court action to recover unpaid marketing licence fees.
-
Decision: Van der Wereld v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny additional roaster quota, who was not a registered grower by the required date. The decision was related to Regulation IIM-162-1981 “Roaster Quota Allocation.”
-
Decision: Elkview Enterprises Ltd. v. B.C. Egg Marketing Board
BCFIRB dismisses Elkview Enterprises Ltd.’s appeal against BCEMB’s decision regarding the amendment of its Temporary Restricted Licence Quota permit. The decision emphasized the temporary nature of the permit and the need for Elkview to acquire quota.
-
Preliminary decision: Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The appeal by Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. regarding the BCEMB’s lack of response to a letter about the enriched cage policy was dismissed. The appellant was not aggrieved by an order or decision, as required for an appeal under the Natural Products Marketing (B.C.) Act. The filing fee was returned.
-
Decision: Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to mandate enriched cage systems and other housing standards. Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. sought an extension for filing the appeal beyond the 30-day limit, citing ongoing discussions and lack of response as reasons. The decision was related to the New Hen Housing Policy.