Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Preliminary decision: Island Egg Sales Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The document addresses a procedural decision by the British Columbia Marketing Board (BCMB) to stay the imposition of over-quota levies on Island Egg Sales Ltd. by the BCEMB, pending a hearing on the merits of the appeal.
-
Supplementary Decision: Island Egg Sales Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The appeal concerns the BCEMB’s decisions denying the transfer of specialty egg production between grading stations. The decision addresses the issues of over-quota levies and the return of the Terrace quota. The panel also discusses the awarding of costs due to errors in the BCEMB’s decisions.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to limit flock size and impose marketing licence fees. The appellants challenged the decision, arguing for flexibility in the regulated marketing system to accommodate niche market producers. The decision was related to the marketing licence fees and quota system policies.
-
Decision: Eggstream Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision concerning Temporary Restricted Licence Quota allocation. Eggstream Farms Ltd. contested the denial of additional TRLQ for organic egg production, alleging breach of a settlement agreement and unfair treatment in quota allocation.
-
Decision: Eggstream Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny additional Temporary Restricted Licence Quota (TRLQ) for organic egg production. Eggstream Farms Ltd. alleged breach of a settlement agreement and sought additional TRLQ allocation. The decision was related to the Revised TRLQ Program.
-
Decision: British Columbia Egg Processors Council v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to reduce buy-back remuneration to processors. The British Columbia Egg Processors Council challenged the fairness of the decision, arguing it placed BC graders at a disadvantage and sought either rescission or amendment to align with Canadian averages. The decision was related to buy-back remuneration policy.
-
Decision: Eggstream Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny a request to reinstate a withdrawn appeal concerning TRLQ allocation. Eggstream Farms Ltd. argued that the BCEMB’s actions frustrated a mediated settlement and sought to adjudicate the issue. The decision was related to the administration of the TRLQ program.
-
Preliminary Decision: Elkview Enterprises Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The preliminary decision addresses whether the appeal should be dismissed as “frivolous, vexatious or trivial”. The appeal concerns a challenge to the BCEMB’s decision regarding the amendment of its Temporary Restricted Licence Quota Permit.
-
Decision: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s seizure decision to enforce orders. The appellants contested the seizure of layers, arguing against the authority and notification process.
-
Consent Order: Delight v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The British Columbia Marketing Board issued a consent order extending the deadline for the appellants to maintain up to 2400 layers from December 31, 1989, to January 31, 1990, while keeping all other aspects of the original decision unchanged.