Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: Island Farms Dairies Co-operative Association v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s policy decision to increase the Marketing Costs & Losses Levy by $1.96/HL to address losses from BSE.
-
Decision: Jacobsen v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
The BCMMB sought a summary dismissal of Jacobsen’s appeal regarding the determination of the raw milk hauling rate, arguing it was out of time, frivolous, vexatious, or trivial, and had been dealt with in another proceeding. The appeal was related to the Board’s Consolidated Order on freight rates.
-
Decision: Thomson d.b.a. Inverine Developments v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny a request for special regulatory accommodations for establishing a 3000 head dairy farm with a UHT processing plant. The appellant argued for quota allotment and regulatory changes, citing innovation in production and product.
-
Decision: Jansen v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to not convert Jansen’s Special Permit Layer Quota (SPLQ) to specialty quota. Jansen argued that his SPLQ permit should have been converted in accordance with BCFIRB directions related to specialty production permits.
-
Decision: Jacobsen v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision on raw milk hauling rates for Jacobsen’s proposed farm. Jacobsen contested the freight rate calculation and sought discretionary relief or amendment to the Consolidated Order. The decision was related to the BCMMB’s transportation regulations and milk transportation rates.
-
Decision: Island Farms Dairies Co-op Association v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision concerning an increase in the vendor marketing costs and losses levy. Island Farms Dairies Co-op Association challenges the procedural fairness and evidentiary requirements related to the levy. The decision was related to the policy appeal process.
-
Preliminary decision: Hodge v. Eben
Complaint related to unsightliness from storage of non-farm equipment and construction materials on a property. The complaint was dismissed due to jurisdiction, as the complaint did not result from a farm operation.
-
Decision: Fletcher’s Fine Foods Ltd. and Britco Export Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCHMC’s decision to uphold the Respondent’s letter dated June 29, 1992. The Appellants contested the decision related to hog marketing orders. The decision was related to the allocation of British Columbia produced hogs for the Chinatown “hot hog market.”
-
Decision: Intercontinental Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission
The appeal concerns whether the BCHMC engaged in price fixing. Preliminary objections addressed include the timeliness of the Notice of Appeal and the validity of a supplementary Notice of Appeal. The decision relates to the BCHMC’s jurisdiction to propose a pricing formula for hogs under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Decision: Harrison v. Mykalb Holdings Ltd.
Complaint related to odour from a poultry farm in Langley.