Industry: Chicken
-
Decision: Jay Bee Farm Ltd., Wilson d.b.a. Luck of the Draw Broiler Farm, and Vance Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s quota compliance decision to impose penalties for over-production under Interim Order 313. The decision was related to quota compliance and the New Grower Program.
-
Decision: Stanley v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s order decision to amend Regulation No. lM-127-1979. Appellant claimed discrimination against smaller chicken producers by allocating quotas that favour larger growers.
-
Procedural decision: Vance Poultry Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Request for a stay of the penalties imposed by BCCMB Order #313, pending the appeal hearing outcome.
-
Decision: Krahn and Reitsema v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decisions regarding transitional quota as outlined in Order 320. Appellants appealed the denial of transitional quota related to a farm purchase and in a quota purchase.
-
Decision: High Plains Poultry Farm Ltd. and Greenbelt Estates Ltd. v. B.C. Chicken Marketing Board
The B.C. Marketing Board sets aside underproduction penalties against High Plains Poultry Farm Ltd. and Greenbelt Estates Ltd., finding BCCMB Order 313’s application ambiguous regarding winter production penalties. BCMB recommends reviewing Order 313 to improve clarity and align with intended policy objectives.
-
Decision: Hong d.b.a. Hong Lee Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny a specialty chicken production permit of 1500-birds/week. The appellant argued for grandfathering based on past production levels and market demand for “Buddhist” chicken. The decision was related to the New Entrant, Niche Market and Specialty Program regulations.
-
Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to enter into the National Allocation Agreement and Western Provinces Memorandum of Agreement.
-
Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Decision reasons for appeal of BCCMB’s decision to enter into the National Allocation Agreement and Western Provinces Memorandum of Agreement.
-
Interim Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This interim decision addresses the scope of the BCCMB’s statutory obligation to produce documents in an appeal of 2000 regulatory changes tied to the National Allocation Agreement.
-
Decision: Flockstra v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny additional roaster quota issuance under Regulation No. 1 M-162-1981.