Category: Animal custody appeal
-
Decision: Appellant v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 16 cats in Maple Ridge due to conditions including severe dental and oral distress, unsanitary living conditions, and inadequate care. The cats exhibited signs of illness such as hypersalivation and were found in an environment with high ammonia levels.
-
Preliminary decision: Grande v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding late filing of an appeal. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed after the deadline.
-
Decision: Churchill and Bhasin v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 13 serval cats, 2 dogs, and 1 domestic cat in Little Fort due to conditions including inadequate water, space, ventilation, light, exercise, and unsanitary living conditions. The animals exhibited issues such as malnutrition, fearfulness, and untreated injuries.
-
Decision: Affenzeller v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding four dogs in Vancouver due to abusive behaviour, inadequate veterinary care, and unsanitary living conditions.
-
Decision: R.H. and L.H. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding one dog in Surrey due to physical abuse and concerns about the owner’s mental health. The dog was seized after the owner was observed striking it and subsequently taken into custody under the Mental Health Act.
-
Procedural decision: Bagga v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
BCFIRB rejected an appellant’s request to delay a hearing to secure witnesses. The hearing proceeded as scheduled.
-
Decision: Bagga v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding two dogs in Richmond due to inadequate living conditions, including lack of access to clean water, inadequate space, and unsanitary conditions. The dogs were kept in cramped enclosures with limited light and were often unattended.
-
Decision: Driediger v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 15 dogs and 2 parrots in Lone Butte due to conditions including inadequate ventilation, unsanitary living conditions, lack of veterinary care, and issues with heat and water supply. The dogs exhibited health issues such as periodontal disease, ear infections, and malnutrition.
-
Decision: McGaffin v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 5 dogs in Williams Lake due to unsanitary living conditions, inadequate ventilation, and untreated medical issues including severe dental disease, skin infections, and eye infections. The appellant had a history of past seizures by the BC SPCA.
-
Dismissal: Simkins v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 2 dogs. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s withdrawal.