This is not the document

Sometimes you may land on this page when you are trying to open a specific BCFIRB document. This page is not the document.

How to find the document

Use the following information to help you select the correct file:

  • Decision: R.H. MacDonald & Sons Ltd. v. British Columbia Tree Fruit Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCTFMB’s decision to deny an export licence to R.H. MacDonald & Sons Ltd. The appellant sought a licence to export tree fruit to the United States and off-shore markets, challenging the central selling system’s effectiveness and advocating for multiple export marketing organizations to benefit the industry.

  • Decision: R.H. MacDonald & Sons Ltd. v. British Columbia Tree Fruit Marketing Board

    Appeal of the British Columbia Tree Fruit Marketing Board’s refusal to issue an export licence for the United States and off-shore markets.

  • Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. BC Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.

    Complaint related to hours of operation, lights, and noise from a fruit processing plant. Complaint was referred to a hearing where jurisdiction and normal farm practices would be determined.

  • Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.

    Complaint related to noise, hours of operation, and lights from a fruit processing plant in Abbotsford. Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

  • Decision: Leveque and Others v. Tangaro

    Complaint related to noise from bird scare devices used in a cherry orchard in Lake Country.

  • Preliminary decision: Hanson and LeBourdais v. Asquini

    Complaint related to noise from a propane cannon used for bird control on a tree fruit property. Complaint dismissed as the operation was not considered a farm business under the FPPA.

  • Preliminary decision: Butler v. Jealous Fruits

    Complaint related to noise from frost fans. Complaint dismissed as the complainant withdrew the complaint.

  • Preliminary decision: Britschgi v. Bal

    Complaint related to noise and pollution from helicopter and airblast sprayer use on a cherry orchard in Kelowna. Complaint dismissed as it was deemed frivolous and vexatious, with no reasonable prospect of success under the FPPA. Issues of pollution/chemical exposure fall under other agencies.

1. Search for the document

  1. Use the search box at the top of the page
  2. Enter the document title
  3. Select Documents to limit your results (if necessary)
  4. Choose the document from the results list to open the PDF.

2. Browse all BCFIRB documents

You can also browse all available documents and decisions.

From that page, you can:

  • Filter by category (such as Animal custody appeal)
  • Filter by document type (such as Decision or Correspondence)
  • Filter by keyword

  • Decision: R.H. MacDonald & Sons Ltd. v. British Columbia Tree Fruit Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCTFMB’s decision to deny an export licence to R.H. MacDonald & Sons Ltd. The appellant sought a licence to export tree fruit to the United States and off-shore markets, challenging the central selling system’s effectiveness and advocating for multiple export marketing organizations to benefit the industry.

  • Decision: R.H. MacDonald & Sons Ltd. v. British Columbia Tree Fruit Marketing Board

    Appeal of the British Columbia Tree Fruit Marketing Board’s refusal to issue an export licence for the United States and off-shore markets.

  • Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. BC Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.

    Complaint related to hours of operation, lights, and noise from a fruit processing plant. Complaint was referred to a hearing where jurisdiction and normal farm practices would be determined.

  • Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.

    Complaint related to noise, hours of operation, and lights from a fruit processing plant in Abbotsford. Complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

  • Decision: Leveque and Others v. Tangaro

    Complaint related to noise from bird scare devices used in a cherry orchard in Lake Country.

  • Preliminary decision: Hanson and LeBourdais v. Asquini

    Complaint related to noise from a propane cannon used for bird control on a tree fruit property. Complaint dismissed as the operation was not considered a farm business under the FPPA.

  • Preliminary decision: Butler v. Jealous Fruits

    Complaint related to noise from frost fans. Complaint dismissed as the complainant withdrew the complaint.

  • Preliminary decision: Britschgi v. Bal

    Complaint related to noise and pollution from helicopter and airblast sprayer use on a cherry orchard in Kelowna. Complaint dismissed as it was deemed frivolous and vexatious, with no reasonable prospect of success under the FPPA. Issues of pollution/chemical exposure fall under other agencies.