Milk Marketing Board accommodation levy policy

Regulated marketing in B.C. / Supervisory reviews / Milk Marketing Board accommodation levy policy

In 2010, B.C. Farm Industry Review Board (BCFIRB) completed a supervisory review of accommodation levies in the dairy sector.

What was decided

The review examined accommodation levies charged by the B.C. Milk Marketing Board (BCMMB) on deliveries of milk and cream. This levy funded B.C.’s system for managing and transferring surplus milk, known as the ‘milk-on-demand’ system.

BCFIRB concluded that the levy no longer aligned with sound marketing policy.

On May 4, 2010, BCFIRB issued their decision. They directed BCMMB to:

  1. Repeal the accommodation levy within 6 months
  2. Commission an independent cost analysis to develop a new funding model
  3. Consult interest holders on the new proposed model

Decision on Milk Marketing Board’s Accommodation Levy Policy – May 4, 2010 (PDF, 254KB)

Why BCFIRB conducted this review

In early 2008, Saputo Inc., a dairy processor, filed an appeal under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act (NPMA). In their appeal, they asked BCFIRB to:

  • Repeal the accommodation levy policy
  • Reimburse accommodation levies already paid

BCFIRB dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds, because the appeal was based on a letter that did not constitute a formal decision by the BCMMB.

Although the appeal was not valid under the NPMA, BCFIRB recognized that it raised broader issues of public interest. It launched a supervisory review to examine whether the accommodation levy continued to reflect sound marketing policy.

Goal of the review

The main goal of the review was to determine whether the accommodation levy remained sound marketing policy.

Timeline of the review process

BCFIRB initiated the review on May 29, 2008, to address policy concerns raised in Saputo’s appeal. Saputo questioned whether the accommodation levy aligned with sound marketing policy under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.

The review took place in four phases from May 2008 to May 2010. It involved input from BCMMB, Saputo Inc., and other industry interest holders.