Type: Decision
-
Decision: Andrusek v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding four dogs and one cat in Abbotsford due to unsanitary living conditions, lack of veterinary care and abandonment following eviction. The animals were found in a rental unit after the expiry of the tenancy agreement.
-
Decision: Interim BCCMB pricing formula amendment prior approval period A-180
This is BCFIRB’s decision on the BCCMB’s November 18, 2022, request to extend the A-179 interim pricing formula (the 50% guardrail provision). BCFIRB approves the 50% guardrail provision for period A-180 only, but re-instates its adjustment for Ontario grower margins.
-
Approval: BCFIRB to B.C. Milk Marketing Board — B.C. Milk Marketing Board quota governance review
BCFIRB approves the BCMMB’s recommendations on quota governance, including general quota allocation, quota exchange and whole farm transfers. BCFIRB requires further action on the Graduated Entrant Program to mitigate “double dipping” and defers consideration of extending quota transfer assessment exemptions to fall 2014.
-
Decision: Truax v. Hlusek
Complaint related to herbicide spraying along a property line by a cattle farm near Abbotsford, affecting the complainant’s hay field.
-
Preliminary decision: Barkwill v. Lychowyd and Cockrill
Complaint related to dust from haying and noise from tractor, weed whipper, and chainsaw use. Complaint dismissed as trivial, frivolous, vexatious and not made in good faith.
-
Decision: Vantreight, d.b.a. Vantreight Farms v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s refusal to allow direct marketing of organic storage crops outside a designated agency. Vantreight argued that organic crops should not be subject to the same regulations as conventional crops.
-
Decision: Krecul v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Vancouver due to unsanitary living conditions, inadequate ventilation, and concerns about space and exercise. The dog was kept in a cluttered apartment with odours and potential hazards from falling debris.
-
Decision: Krecul v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Vancouver due to conditions including inadequate ventilation, space, and unsanitary living conditions. The dog was kept in a cluttered apartment with odours and potential hazards from falling debris.
-
Decision: McLeod v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 96 cattle in Quesnel due to inadequate food, water, and shelter, lack of veterinary care, and poor herd management. The cattle exhibited severe malnutrition, frostbite, and other health issues.
-
Preliminary decision: Simpson v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed late and lacking the required filing fee.