Type: Decision
-
Preliminary decision: Ruck and Tuovila v. Deleurme
Complaint related to odour from manure management and mortality disposal at a neighbouring feedlot. Complaint was referred to hearing.
-
Decision: Keeping v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 124 animals in Horsefly due to inadequate nutrition, poor shelter, and lack of veterinary care. The animals, including cattle, sheep, llamas, pigs, chickens, and rabbits, were found in distress with issues such as malnutrition, unsanitary conditions, and untreated medical problems.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission. Decision on the future of regulated vegetable production on Vancouver Island
BCFIRB issues a supervisory decision to the BCVMC regarding the future regulation of vegetable production on Vancouver Island, emphasizing a transparent and fair review process for agency structure.
-
Decision: Wier v. Labrecque
Complaint related to the trespass of GMO plants and chemical overspray from a grain farm in Smithers.
-
Supervisory review decision: Pricing and production in the B.C. chicken industry
The BC Marketing Board restructured chicken pricing with a new Price and Production order, clarifying PPAC’s role, establishing joint committees, and adding arbitration and “exceptional circumstances” rules to ensure transparent, stable pricing and production.
-
Decision: Simans v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 88 animals, including 45 dogs, 18 cats, 1 rabbit, 1 quail, 1 red-eared slider turtle, 5 goats, 1 pot-bellied pig, 3 ducks, 3 sheep, 5 chickens and 5 pigeons in Langley due to conditions including inadequate nutrition, overcrowding, severe dental disease, and untreated medical issues.
-
Dismissal: W. Friesen, Skye Hi Farms Inc., Casey Van Ginkel DBA V3 Farms, Coastline & Bradner Farms v British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission
Appeal of BCBHEC’s Recommendation Report proposing to exempt Asian breeder producers from quota and price regulation, following BCFIRB’s March 29, 2016 order in the original Skye Hi decision. The appeal was dismissed as premature because no final decision had yet been issued.
-
Decision: J. K. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Victoria due to manual intervention for constipation, leading to concerns about inadequate veterinary treatment and potential distress.
-
Decision: Nagetaal v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny an exemption from the Cottage Industry Program eligibility rules. The appellant sought relief based on exceptional circumstances, arguing against the policy that restricts participation to those without prior quota ownership. The BCMMB maintained restrictions were required under BCFIRB’s Specialty Review directions.
-
Decision: Point v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 18 dogs in Vancouver due to conditions including unsanitary living environment, inadequate nutrition, untreated medical issues such as ear and skin infections, and a broken pelvis. The dogs exhibited signs of neglect, including being underweight and fearful.