Type: Decision
-
Decision: Campbell v. Mission Hill Estate Vineyard and Hans d.b.a. Hans Estate
Complaint related to noise from propane cannons used for bird control on vineyards in Osoyoos.
-
Decision: Woodcreek Farms et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to amend the New Entrant Program rules to create a quota matching program for mainstream new entrant growers. The appellants sought inclusion in the program to access mainstream quota, arguing procedural unfairness and discrimination against specialty growers. The decision was related to the New Entrant Program rules.
-
Preliminary decision: Kaye et al v. Chang
Complaint related to odour and unsightliness from a marijuana grow operation in Chilliwack. Complaint was adjourned on the grounds that the farm had ceased operation.
-
Preliminary decision: Jones v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Procedural decision regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was deemed filed on time after determining the appellant received the decision on April 7, 2017, allowing the appeal to proceed.
-
Preliminary decision: Ridland v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the timing of an appeal. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed late.
-
Decision: Mbamy v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of costs regarding the seizure of 3 dogs. The appeal focused on the reasonableness of care costs claimed by the BC SPCA, particularly in light of one dog being adopted out prematurely due to an error.
-
Decision: Hubick v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Vancouver due to traumatic injury consistent with being thrown, resulting in a dislocated hip. The dog exhibited pain and required significant veterinary intervention. The appellant had a history of harsh disciplinary techniques with a previous dog.
-
Decision: Unger v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding four dogs in Kersley due to conditions including unsanitary living environments, inadequate ventilation, and emotional neglect. The dogs were kept in areas with urine and feces, and lacked adequate social interaction and exercise.
-
Decision: Korthuis and Middleton v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to terminate applications for the New Entrant Program. Appellants challenged the evaluation process and consistency of the New Producer Program Rules. The decision was related to the New Entrant Program.
-
Decision: E.M. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding three cats in Duncan due to conditions including high ammonia levels, fecal and urine contamination, and untreated medical issues such as flea infestations and lung damage.