Type: Decision
-
Preliminary decision: Jones v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Procedural decision regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was deemed filed on time after determining the appellant received the decision on April 7, 2017, allowing the appeal to proceed.
-
Preliminary decision: Ridland v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the timing of an appeal. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed late.
-
Decision: Mbamy v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of costs regarding the seizure of 3 dogs. The appeal focused on the reasonableness of care costs claimed by the BC SPCA, particularly in light of one dog being adopted out prematurely due to an error.
-
Decision: Hubick v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Vancouver due to traumatic injury consistent with being thrown, resulting in a dislocated hip. The dog exhibited pain and required significant veterinary intervention. The appellant had a history of harsh disciplinary techniques with a previous dog.
-
Decision: Unger v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding four dogs in Kersley due to conditions including unsanitary living environments, inadequate ventilation, and emotional neglect. The dogs were kept in areas with urine and feces, and lacked adequate social interaction and exercise.
-
Decision: Korthuis and Middleton v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to terminate applications for the New Entrant Program. Appellants challenged the evaluation process and consistency of the New Producer Program Rules. The decision was related to the New Entrant Program.
-
Decision: E.M. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding three cats in Duncan due to conditions including high ammonia levels, fecal and urine contamination, and untreated medical issues such as flea infestations and lung damage.
-
Preliminary decision: Stremler v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the dismissal of an appeal due to the appellant’s failure to submit the required filing fee within the specified timeframe.
-
Decision: Vancouver Island Produce Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s supervisory decision to terminate the Agency Application Process. Vancouver Island Produce Ltd. challenged the process’s legal authority, procedural fairness, and policy justification. The decision was related to the “Supervisory Review of Regulated Vegetable Production on Vancouver Island – Agency Application Process 2017 Crop Year.”
-
Preliminary decision: Pepper v. MacDonald
Complaint related to noise from chickens and roosters, dust, and water runoff from a poultry operation in Princeton. BCFIRB found the complaint about noise, dust, and runoff was connected to a farm business and referred the matter to a panel for a full hearing.