Type: Decision
-
Decision: Dutra v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny entry into the Graduated Entry Program. Alfred Dutra argued procedural unfairness, inconsistency with the Consolidated Order, and irrelevant personal considerations. The decision was related to the BCMMB’s Graduated Entry Program.
-
Decision: Vancouver Island Produce Ltd. (VIP) v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to dismiss Vancouver Island Produce Ltd.’s appeal. VIP challenged the BCVMC’s recommendations regarding agency structure and licensing on Vancouver Island, which were part of a supervisory process evaluating the regulation of vegetable production. The appeal was dismissed under sections 31(1)(c), (f), and (g) of the Administrative Tribunals Act.
-
Decision: Prior approval of B.C. Egg Marketing Board Consolidated Orders
BCFIRB approves specific amendments to the BCEMB’s Consolidated Orders, including changes to quota issuance, new producer program rules, and provincial quota exchange rules, while requiring further assessment for other proposed changes.
-
Decision: BCFIRB to BCEMB — Approval of 2017 Quota Distribution Policy
BCFIRB provides prior approval for the B.C. Egg Marketing Board’s (BCEMB) 2017 Quota Distribution Policy. BCFIRB also establishes stricter reporting and consultation criteria for all future quota distribution requests.
-
Decision: The future of regulated vegetable production on Vancouver Island — Agency designation
BCFIRB issues a decision on the agency designation for regulated vegetable production on Vancouver Island, granting agency licenses to IVCA and VIFP for the 2017-18 Crop Year, while VIP is granted a Producer-Shipper Licence.
-
Decision: Parker v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 18 cats and 2 horses in Roberts Creek due to inadequate shelter, unsanitary conditions, and untreated medical issues including dental disease, ear infections and lameness. Animals were kept in a shed with high ammonia and freezing temperatures; horses were stalled in deep manure.
-
Procedural decision: Moller v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Procedural decision regarding the appellant’s request for summonses for 17 individuals to testify in an appeal concerning the seizure of cats and kittens. The presiding member issued summonses for two individuals, finding their testimony relevant to the issues of distress and the return of the animals.
-
Decision: 0802881 BC Ltd (Stasis Farms) v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to direct Stasis Farms to use its specialty quota for quota period A-145 to produce and ship specialty product for Wingtat Game Bird Packers Ltd. The appellant argued that the decision would lead to financial harm and disrupt existing market arrangements.
-
Decision: Marleau v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 2 pigs, 1 calf, 1 llama, 4 horses, and 1 dog in Mission due to conditions including inadequate food, water and shelter, unsanitary living conditions, untreated medical issues such as lice and skin irritations, and hazards like debris and exposed nails.
-
Decision: Harrison v. Jaeger
Complaint related to noise from a barking dog on a sheep farm in Grand Forks.