Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: The British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board v. 4 R’s Turkey Farm
Appeal of British Columbia Marketing Board’s decision to instruct the BCTMB to allow the transfer of quota to Cloverhill Farms Ltd. The appellant argued errors in quota transfer requirements, economies of scale, and authority on quota matters.
-
Decision: Skyacres Turkey Ranches Ltd. v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
This supplemental decision addresses the production of documents in the appeal by Skyacres Turkey Ranches Ltd. against the BCTMB regarding a quota transfer. The decision focuses on the relevance and confidentiality of documents related to quota holdings, leases, and allocations, as well as BCTMB’s policy and decision-making processes.
-
Decision: Kuszyk d.b.a. Three Gates Farm v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny the appellants’ request to grow 18,000 kg live weight under an Assurance of Supply lease. The appeal challenges the Board’s previous decisions regarding quota transfers and the appellants’ status as growers.
-
Decision: 4 R’s Turkey Farm v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision to deny the transfer of 136,500 pounds of broiler turkey quota to Cloverhill Farms Ltd. and to assess an “increase licensing fee” for overproduction in the 1980 quota year.
-
Decision: Sunrise Poultry Processors Ltd. v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s allocation decision to split whole bird turkey quota between Sunrise Poultry and Rossdown Natural Foods. Sunrise Poultry’s issue with the allocation of 206,043 kgs of whole bird quota instead of its survey submission quantity. The decision was related to the New Commercial Allocation Policy.
-
Decision: Teamsters Local Union No. 464 v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s milk transportation decision to restructure routes. Teamsters Local Union No. 464 argued job loss and disruption for its members, citing lack of transparency in the bidding process. The decision was related to BCMMB’s transportation policy and Consolidated Orders.
-
Judicial review decision: Stewart v. British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board
Judicial review of BCFIRB’s February 26, 2009, decision, which had dismissed an appeal of the B.C. Milk Marketing Board’s retraction of the Stewarts’ GEP quota due to non-compliance.
-
Preliminary decision summary: Reid d.b.a. Olera Farms v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Summary on preliminary decision that addresses preliminary issues in an appeal against the BCEMB’s decision to enforce its Standing Order on marketing regulated products. The decision discusses the admissibility of evidence for statutory interpretation and the bias claim.
-
Decision: Stewart v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to retract quota under the Graduated Entry Program (GEP). The Stewarts argued compliance with GEP rules and sought to retain their quota until transitioning it to their own facility. The decision was related to the GEP Regularization process.
-
Decision: Schwaerzle v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to remove Schwaerzle from the Graduated Entry Program (GEP) wait list. Schwaerzle contested the removal, citing the regularization of GEP quota and his leasing arrangement as reasons. The decision was related to the GEP Rules and eligibility criteria.