Supervisory Review: Regulated Vegetable Industry (2019-2020)
-
Letter: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Response to questions re: Prokam Enterprises Ltd.
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. responds to BCFIRB’s December 4, 2019, letter, confirming the viability of its Grower Marketing Agreement (GMA) with Prokam but strongly opposing a producer-shipper licence.
-
Submission: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Reply to Prokam and BCVMC submissions
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. files its reply submission in the Vegetable Supervisory Review, requesting that its confidential marketing information be accepted on a redacted basis.
-
Letter: B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission to BCFIRB — Vegetable supervisory review and Prokam Enterprises Ltd.
BCVMC submits a response to BCFIRB regarding Prokam Enterprises Ltd.’s application for a producer-shipper order, arguing against the application and emphasizing the importance of maintaining the orderly marketing system.
-
Letter: B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission to BCFIRB — Vegetable supervisory review and Prokam Enterprises Ltd.
BCVMC responds to BCFIRB’s supervisory panel directions regarding Prokam Enterprises Ltd.’s delivery allocation and marketing options for the 2020/21 crop year.
-
Decision: Vancouver Island Produce Ltd. (VIP) v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to dismiss Vancouver Island Produce Ltd.’s appeal. VIP challenged the BCVMC’s recommendations regarding agency structure and licensing on Vancouver Island, which were part of a supervisory process evaluating the regulation of vegetable production. The appeal was dismissed under sections 31(1)(c), (f), and (g) of the Administrative Tribunals Act.
-
Decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. and Thomas Fresh Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to not issue a producer-shipper license to Prokam Enterprises Ltd. Prokam sought relief under BCFIRB’s supervisory jurisdiction for a license and delivery allocation adjustments for the 2020-2021 growing season.