Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Preliminary decision: Simpson v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed late and lacking the required filing fee.
-
Preliminary decision: Simpson v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed late and for lack of jurisdiction.
-
Preliminary decision: Sohi v. Malenstyn
Complaint related to dust, manure management, and flooding caused by a cranberry farm. Respondent’s request for a further adjournment is dismissed.
-
Preliminary decision: Simpson v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was dismissed due to being filed late and for lack of jurisdiction.
-
Decision: Schwaerzle v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to remove Schwaerzle from the Graduated Entry Program (GEP) wait list. Schwaerzle contested the removal, citing the regularization of GEP quota and his leasing arrangement as reasons. The decision was related to the GEP Rules and eligibility criteria.
-
Decision: Schwuchow v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to reallot GEP quotas. Schwuchow’s concern was about the investigation into DeGroot’s role as shipper of the quotas. The decision was related to the Graduated Entry Program Quota Allocation.
-
Decision: Sarkozi v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding two horses in Mission due to inadequate veterinary care, including untreated dental conditions and overgrown hooves, and failure to provide consistent care and shelter.
-
Decision: Saputo Inc. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
The appeal concerns Saputo Inc.’s request for a repeal of Section 5 of Schedule 6 of the BCMMB’s Consolidated Order and reimbursement of levies. The decision addresses whether the January 21, 2008 letter from BCMMB constitutes an appealable decision and the timeliness of the appeal filing.
-
Decision: Running W Egg Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to withhold payment for eggs delivered to the grader. Running W Egg Farm Ltd. contested the withholding of payment, arguing it was not responsible for the mould found on the eggs. The decision was related to BCEMB’s Consolidated Order.
-
Decision: BCFIRB to Rossdown Farms Ltd. — Request for reconsideration of home weeks
BCFIRB (as the B.C. Marketing Board) denies Rossdown Farms Ltd.’s request to reconsider a previous supervisory decision (January 17, 2003), which restricted its production pickup to a single “home week”.