Type: Decision
-
Decision: BC Hot House Foods Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny adjournment of a hearing on Global Greenhouse Produce Inc.’s agency application. BC Hot House Foods Inc. argued inadequate notice and preparation time regarding competition concerns with Global. The decision was related to the procedural handling of agency applications under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Decision: James v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny the production of On-Farm Food Safety Reports. James sought exemption from pooling, arguing the reports were relevant to product quality and pricing. The decision was related to the pooling of sales and agency fee structure.
-
Decision: V.I.P. Produce Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to grant temporary authority to Rage’s Farms Ltd. and recommend agency designation to VIFP. V.I.P. Produce Ltd. raised issues regarding procedural integrity and agency designation. The decision was related to the agency designation and marketing of regulated vegetables on Vancouver Island.
-
Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s jurisdiction decision to regulate export production. BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, LP challenged the BCVMC’s authority under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act and NAFTA implications. The decision was related to the marketing of vegetables in export trade.
-
Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
This decision addresses the BCVMC’s application to adjourn an appeal hearing concerning the regulation of vegetable marketing in export trade. The appeal, filed by BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P., challenges the BCVMC’s authority to regulate export production and raises issues of fairness in marketing through BC Hot House Foods Inc.
-
Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appellant withdrew its appeal of Order 10/03(a).
-
Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Letter regarding appellant withdrawal of appeal of Order 10/03(a).
-
Decision: Vaneck v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny a permit to grow chicken. The appellant argued he should be treated as a separate legal entity and that the decision hindered innovation and market development. The decision was related to the BCCMB’s General Orders, specifically Part 50.
-
Decision: B.C. Food Processors Association v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to settle the terms of the 1986 Broccoli and Cauliflower contracts, specifically regarding price and payment. B.C. Food Processors Association challenged the adherence to the Marketing Order and Negotiation Policy. The decision was related to the Marketing Order and Commission Crop Negotiation Policy.
-
Decision: V.I.P Produce Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to grant conditional agency status to VIFP in association with BC Fresh. VIP and IVCA contested the decision, arguing for a single agency on Vancouver Island and citing procedural defects. The decision was related to the agency designation and governance issues within the Vancouver Island vegetable industry.