Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: Skyacres Turkey Ranches Ltd. v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision regarding quota transfer conditions. Skyacres Turkey Ranches Ltd. challenged the decision and General Orders that excluded transferees from “registered grower” status.
-
Decision: J&E Egg Farm v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s summary dismissal decision to proceed to a full hearing. J&E Egg Farm’s request for exemption from the 75% self-marketing requirement and inclusion of Free Bird Organic sales. The decision was related to BCEMB’s Consolidated Orders.
-
How to participate in a Natural Products Marketing Act Appeal (Process guidance for Regulated Marketing Appeals)
Provides guidance on how individuals or organizations can participate in a regulated marketing appeal. It outlines the roles of witnesses and interveners, the application process for intervener status, and the levels of participation available.
-
Decision: Skye Hi Farms Inc., Casey Van Ginkel DBA V3 Farms and Wilhelm Friesen & Lillian Fehr DBA W. Friesen Enterprises v British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission
Appeal of BCBHEC’s regulatory decision to enact Amending Order 11 and allot quota under the Regularization of Historically Non-compliant Silkie and Taiwanese Producers Program. Appellants argued the program failed to provide sufficient quota, undermined existing businesses, and was procedurally flawed.
-
Decision: teBrinke d.b.a. Mountainview Acres v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to impose an overmarketing levy and license suspension for period A-136.
-
Decision: Wingtat Game Bird Packers v British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision deeming a chicken flock a disaster flock and requiring the appellant to purchase product from Stasis Farm Ltd. using a specified payment methodology.
-
Stay decision: Mountain View Acres v British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Stay decision on BCCMB’s refusal to allocate quota for period A-136, following over-marketing penalties imposed for excess production in period A-135.
-
Decision: Agrifoods International Cooperative Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCMMB’s decision not to renew Agrifoods’ milk hauling contract for Zones 4, 6 and 7, instead awarding it to Vedder Resources.
-
Preliminary decision: Oranya Farms II Holdings Inc. and Thomas Reid Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
A preliminary application from the appellants to extend the BCCMB’s July 2016 specialty quota conversion deadline
-
NPMA Practice Directive
Sets the usual time periods for completing procedural steps (45 business days) and releasing final decisions (45 business days) for regulated marketing appeals filed under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.