Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Letter: BCFIRB to B.C. Egg Marketing Board — Red tape reduction proposal
BCFIRB declines to support BCEMB’s request that the Minister of Agriculture amend the British Columbia Egg Marketing Scheme to remove the requirement for BCFIRB’s prior approval of quota terms and conditions. BCFIRB emphasizes the need for continued oversight to ensure sound marketing policy and public interest considerations are met.
-
Decision: Andrusek v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding five dogs and one cat in Mission due to conditions including severe flea infestations, untreated medical issues such as ear infections, urinary tract infection and broken bones, and unsanitary living conditions with excessive feces and dirt.
-
Preliminary decision: The Corporation of Delta v. Hothi Farms Inc.
Complaint related to the unsightly storage of vehicles, equipment, and scrap metal at a vegetable farm in Delta. Complaint dismissed as the disturbance did not meet the definition of “other disturbance” under the FPPA.
-
Stay decision: Mountain View Acres v British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Stay decision on BCCMB’s refusal to allocate quota for period A-136, following over-marketing penalties imposed for excess production in period A-135.
-
Decision: Swart v. Pirjo Holt d.b.a. Serendipity Farms
Complaint related to noise, odour, flies, bright lights and unsightliness from an equestrian centre in Kelowna.
-
Decision: Agrifoods International Cooperative Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCMMB’s decision not to renew Agrifoods’ milk hauling contract for Zones 4, 6 and 7, instead awarding it to Vedder Resources.
-
Preliminary decision: Oranya Farms II Holdings Inc. and Thomas Reid Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
A preliminary application from the appellants to extend the BCCMB’s July 2016 specialty quota conversion deadline
-
Preliminary decision: Taylor v. Holt
Complaint related to odour, noise, and flies from a livestock shelter and pen for goats. Complaint dismissed as respondent was not operating a farm business under the FPPA.
-
Procedural decision: Kelpin v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Procedural decision regarding an adjournment request for a hearing on the seizure of four horses in Langley. The request was denied due to scheduling conflicts and the need to minimize costs and ensure timely resolution in the best interests of the animals.
-
Preliminary decision: Harvey v. HS Jansen and Sons Ltd.
Complaint related to manure management practices of a nearby dairy farm in Armstrong. Request for recusal of panel member due to alleged bias based on past employment with farm organizations.