Type: Decision
-
Decision: Lacey v. Instant Lawns Turf Farm (1994) Limited d.b.a. Westcoast Instant Lawns
Complaint related to odours from composting operations at a turf farm in Delta.
-
Procedural decision: McAnerin v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Procedural decision regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was allowed to proceed as the appellant received the decision late due to lack of internet access in an isolated area.
-
Decision: Whaley Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to apply GEP rules to quota reallocated to Whaley Farms under the Regularization Program. Whaley Farms contested the application of the 10/10/10 and LIFO provisions, arguing it affected their ability to manage the quota. The decision was related to BCMMB’s Consolidated Order.
-
Preliminary decision: Complainants v. Vane Investments Ltd.
Complaint related to document disclosure and expert report timing concerning the operation of a duck farm in Aldergrove.
-
Decision: Townline Enterprises v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny agency status for marketing ‘mini’ hothouse cucumbers. Townline Enterprises sought exemption to market directly, citing concerns over Co-op’s marketing strategy. The decision was related to the marketing structure under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Decision: Woodrow v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to refuse renewal of a packing house licence for Woodrow Bros. Farms. The appellant contested the refusal based on alleged bias and financial strain due to transportation costs.
-
Decision: Western Food Processors Association v. British Columbia Vegetable Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s order to uphold a new price setting system. Western Food Processors Association challenged the removal of arbitration in favor of mediation in the price setting process. The decision was related to the “Order Regulating the Marketing of Regulated Product for Processing or Manufacture.”
-
Decision: Washtock v. B.C. Chicken Marketing Board
BCFIRB dismisses the appeal for an extension to file against the BCCMB’s decision denying additional time for NEP quota production. The appeal was filed beyond the 30-day limit, with no special circumstances justifying the delay.
-
Dismissal: Rittenhouse Produce v. British Columbia Interior Vegetable Marketing Board
Appeal of BC Interior Vegetable Marketing Board’s decision to deny Rittenhouse Produce the right to market carrots as in previous years.
-
Decision: Sandhu Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s alleged decision not to grant a packing house licence to Sandhu Farms Ltd. The appellant argued the denial affected their ability to market produce efficiently. The decision was related to the BCVMC’s letter dated August 7, 1987.