Category: Farm practices complaint
-
Preliminary decision: Morgan Creek Homeowners Association v. Sekhon
Complaint related to noise from propane cannons used for bird control at a blueberry farm in Surrey. BCFIRB ruled that they had jurisdiction and referred the matter to a hearing.
-
Correspondence from BCFIRB: Mitchell v. Van Maren
Letter from BCFIRB addressing a dispute over odours from a duck farm in Chilliwack, outlining past complaints, farm ownership changes, and the process for filing a new formal complaint.
-
Decision: McMurtry v. SNP Blueberry Farm Ltd. and Sekhon Blueberry Farm Ltd.
Complaint related to noise from propane cannons used for bird control on a blueberry farm in Surrey.
-
Decision: Mitchell v. Bhullar d.b.a. Bhullar Farm Produce
Complaint related to noise from propane cannons used for bird control on a blueberry farm in Langley.
-
Decision: Jaeckel v. Gobind Farms
Complaint related to noise, diesel storage, and excess runoff water in North Saanich. The complaint was adjourned, as the issues are also before the Supreme Court of British Columbia in related civil litigation.
-
Decision: McLeod and Lambeth v. Engqvist
Complaint related to noise from propane cannon and audible bird scare devices on a berry farm in Central Saanich.
-
Preliminary decision: Maddalozzo v. BC Pacific Coast Fruit Products Ltd.
Complaint related to hours of operation, lights, and noise from a fruit processing plant. Complaint was referred to a hearing where jurisdiction and normal farm practices would be determined.
-
Decision: MacLeod d.b.a. Hold Fast Growers v. Mobbs d.b.a. Stave Falls Riding Stables
Complaint related to dust and light disturbance from an equestrian facility in Mission.
-
Decision: Lychowyd v. Washtock and Barkwill
Complaint related to dust, noise, odour, and manure management from horse operations in Summerland.
-
Preliminary decision: Lychowyd v. Washtock
Complaint related to odour from horse manure, dust from chain harrowing, and noise from skid steer operation. The hearing on these issues will proceed as scheduled despite the respondents’ request for adjournment.