Category: Supervisory review
-
Letter: Basham Law to BCFIRB — Response to Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activity Review
Counsel for MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. argues that BCFIRB lacks jurisdiction to investigate its motivations and good faith in filing a Notice of Civil Claim, asserting that such matters are for the courts to decide.
-
Letter: DLA Piper (Canada) LLP to BCFIRB — Supervisory review of B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission
Counsel for Bajwa Farms Ltd. asserts that BCFIRB lacks jurisdiction to investigate complainant participants’ conduct as part of the supervisory review of the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to parties — Submissions on hearing counsel recommendations
BCFIRB requests Prokam Enterprises Ltd. and other participants to provide substantive submissions on Hearing Counsel’s recommendations and the commissioners’ letter regarding the allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity review.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to Stakeholders — Clarification of long-term chicken pricing formula process
BCFIRB clarifies to all stakeholders that the BC Chicken Marketing Board has not yet fulfilled the Terms of Reference, BCFIRB has not given prior approval to any long-term formula, and BCFIRB will not be taking over the pricing review process.
-
Reply: Hira Rowan LLP to BCFIRB — Response to Prokam application for judicial review
Counsel for B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission general manager Andre Solymosi responds to BCFIRB regarding Prokam’s petition for judicial review, highlighting procedural flaws and the absence of supporting affidavits.
-
Letter: BCCMB to BCFIRB — Response regarding weight class change proposal information request (Edited)
BC Chicken Marketing Board submits a corrected letter to BCFIRB, revising its financial analysis of the A-175/A-176 Ontario margin adjustment but reaffirming its A-177 interim formula proposal.
-
Letter: BCCMB to BCFIRB — Response to weight class change proposal information request
BC Chicken Marketing Board responds to BCFIRB’s July 8, 2022, request for more information. BCCMB provides further analysis and context on the weight class change proposal. The Board discusses various options and deliberations, including the Ontario grower margin amendment and the BC Feed Conversion Rate.
-
Letter: BCCMB to BCFIRB — Response to PPPABC on Long Term Formula Development Process
BC Chicken Marketing Board refutes the Primary Poultry Processors Association of BC’s August 9, 2022 allegations of bias and process failure, defends its Cost Recovery Model as sound marketing policy, and requests BCFIRB affirm its authority.
-
Letter: DLA Piper (Canada) LLP to BCFIRB — Supervisory review of B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission
Counsel for Bajwa Farms Ltd. responds to BCFIRB regarding the supervisory review related to the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission, stating their belief that there is no basis for further process involving Bajwa Farms Ltd.
-
Letter: Basham Law to BCFIRB — Response to hearing counsel proposal to investigate and make findings
Counsel for MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. opposes the proposal for BCFIRB to investigate allegations of bad faith related to MPL’s civil claim, arguing it falls outside the supervisory review’s terms of reference and BCFIRB’s authority.