Type: Decision
-
Decision: Van der Wereld v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCCMB’s Interim Order #199, which the appellant argued disproportionately affected roaster growers by aligning a price reduction with a broiler cycle.
-
Decision: Van der Wereld v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCCMB’s New Grower Program regarding quota conversion has been withdrawn by the appellant following a settlement.
-
Decision: van Ginkel v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCCMB’s decision to deny a specialty permit based on the appellant’s “previous quota ownership” as a minority shareholder.
-
Supplemental Decision: DeBoer v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to maintain its previous ruling. DeBoer sought reconsideration based on new evidence regarding a quota increase. The decision was related to the quota increase program implemented in 1980.
-
Decision: Korthuis d.b.a. Try Poultry Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny secondary and transitional quota allocations. The appellant challenged the decision based on his status as a registered grower and compliance with quota conditions. The decision was related to Orders #303 and #320 concerning quota allocations.
-
Decision: Sunrise Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to implement a Revised Spot Market Supply Program.
-
Decision: DeBoer v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to cancel DeBoer’s 39 percent quota increase if he marketed with a Lower Mainland processor. The decision was related to the policy encouraging the establishment of a grower and processing industry in the Interior.
-
Decision: Reid d.b.a. Thomas Reid Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decisions to impose back levies, set permit levels, impose permit fees, and deny production rights at a specific location. Reid’s issues relate to specialty chicken production and the impact of policy rules on their organic chicken operation.
-
Decision: Korthuis d.b.a. Try Poultry Farms v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to impose production penalties for unauthorized production. The BCCMB’s order required 381-day stand down.
-
Procedural Decision: Sunrise Poultry Processors Ltd. and Others v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The BC Marketing Panel addressed a procedural issue regarding the rescheduling of an appeal hearing. The hearing was rescheduled, with conditions on the duration and sequence of witness testimonies.