Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: Flockstra v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny additional roaster quota issuance under Regulation No. 1 M-162-1981.
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal concerning a stay application of the new August 15, 2000 BCCMB regulations, specifically challenging revisions to the Export Program under Part 25.
-
Preliminary decision: Fehr & Friesen v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The decision addressed preliminary issues regarding the timeliness of appeals against the BCCMB’s August 15, 2000 regulations and a November 15, 2002 decision.
-
Interim Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This supplementary decision addresses document production in appeals against the August 15, 2000, regulations of the BCCMB.
-
Decision: British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Producers Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to not adjust the price of hatching eggs and to not appoint a pricing committee. The appellant sought an upward adjustment of hatching egg prices and the establishment of a pricing committee. The decision was related to the cost of production formula for hatching eggs.
-
Preliminary decision: BC Chicken Growers Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The BC Chicken Growers Association sought a stay of the BCCMB’s decision to remove the over-marketing levy for period A-53.
-
Decision: Fairline Developments (1992) Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision regarding payment for specialty chicken products rendered during the Avian Influenza outbreak. Fairline Developments contested the compensation amount, seeking full market value for specialty products. The decision was related to the BCCMB’s compensation policy for rendered products.
-
Decision: Friesen and Fehr v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s policy decision to implement rules affecting permit terms, corporate ownership, and export issues. Appellants challenged the restrictions on permit growth, transferability, and export limitations under the August 2000 policy rules, which were related to the New Entrant, Niche Market, and Specialty Program.
-
Decision: Farmcrest Foods Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny Farmcrest Foods Ltd.’s request to increase its specialty permit from 5,000 to 10,000 birds per week to meet processing demands and maintain market viability. The decision was related to the New Entrant, Niche Market and Specialty Program policy.
-
Decision: 89 Chicken Ranch Ltd., Texas Broiler Ranch Ltd., and Glen Lake Chicken Ranch Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny the transfer of chicken quota from Vancouver Island. The appellants sought to relocate and partially sell their quota.