Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: Bingley and Ward v. Lang Vineyards
Complaint related to noise disturbance from a chiller on a neighbouring vineyard in the Naramata Bench.
-
Decision: E.M. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 17 cats, 1 dog, and 8 chickens in Duncan due to unsanitary living conditions, untreated medical issues including upper respiratory infections, roundworms and flea infestations, and malnutrition. The appellant had a history of past seizures by the BC SPCA.
-
Dismissal: CFP Marketing Corporation v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to summarily dismiss CFP’s application for agency status.
-
Decision: Jensen and Pearson v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 40 cats in Prince George due to conditions including unsanitary living environments, untreated medical issues such as severe respiratory infections, dental problems and feline immunodeficiency virus. The property was cluttered with debris, and the cats exhibited signs of distress and illness.
-
Decision: Leismeister v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding two cats in Vancouver due to hazardous living conditions, lack of veterinary care, and issues with interbreeding. The cats were kept in a cluttered environment with inadequate space and were exposed to potential harm from other tenants and animals.
-
Decision: Robbins d.b.a. K&M Farms v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision to refuse directing further processing for K&M Farms’ turkeys. K&M Farms argued for processing services due to market demand for heavy hens and specialty turkey parts. The decision was related to the impact of COVID-19 on processing capacity and the BCTMB’s responsibility to ensure orderly marketing.
-
Decision: Broatch v. British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission
Appeal of BCBHEC’s decision to dismiss the appeal due to lack of an identifiable order, decision, or determination. Broatch’s issue was related to the BCBHEC’s failure to enact a specialty new entrant program for Silkie breeder flocks.
-
Denial: BCFIRB to Mr. Gordon S. Watson — Request for BCFIRB statement
BCFIRB denies Mr. Watson’s request for a statement regarding its and the BCMMB’s awareness in 2005 of personal milk consumption outside the regulatory scheme. BCFIRB confirms it did not collect such information during the 2005 Specialty and New Entrant Review and advises seeking independent legal advice.
-
Decision: Hogan v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 6 horses in Vanderhoof due to conditions including lack of adequate food, water, and shelter, and issues such as starvation, lice infestation, and dental problems. The horses were kept in unsanitary conditions with inadequate shelter and were in distress due to neglect.
-
Decision: Eben v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding six Great Dane dogs in Cowichan Bay due to unsanitary living conditions, inadequate ventilation, and lack of proper care and exercise. The property was cluttered, and the house was in a state of decay, posing risks to the animals.