Industry: Vegetable
-
Letter: BCFIRB to parties — Hearing adjournment and commission composition
BCFIRB requests submissions from the parties regarding the proposed adjournment of the oral hearing dates to January 2022 and seeks analysis from the BCVMC on Mr. Royal’s authority to remain a member.
-
Submission: BCVMC to BCFIRB — Support for adjournment of oral hearing
The B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission responds to BCFIRB’s September 10 letter, stating it fully supports adjourning the oral hearing for the supervisory review into allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity until January/February 2022.
-
Letter: BCVMC to BCFIRB — Response to proposed adjournment of hearing
Counsel for the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission supports the adjournment of the oral hearing for the supervisory review into allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity to January and/or February 2022.
-
Letter: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Support for hearing adjournment
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. responds to BCFIRB’s September 10 letter, supporting the adjournment of the “Bad Faith” supervisory review hearing and providing counsel’s availability for February 2022.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to BCBHEC and BCCMB — Meetings with panel conditional on receiving final recommendations for Chicken Pricing Supervisory Review
BCFIRB informs the BC Broiler Hatching Egg Commission and BC Chicken Marketing Board it will schedule December meetings to discuss their final recommendations, conditional on receiving them by the end of November.
-
Update #2: 2021 Review of Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activities
BCFIRB provides an update on the supervisory review of allegations of bad faith and unlawful activities in the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission, noting that it has issued decisions regarding interim orders, participants in the review and the rules of practice and procedure.
-
Memorandum of argument of Thomas Fresh Inc. and Prokam Enterprises Ltd.
Excerpts from appeals by Thomas Fresh Inc. and Prokam Enterprises Ltd. of decisions and cease and desist orders issued by the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission.
-
Decision: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. BCVMC — Appeals #N1908 and #N2101
BCFIRB issues a decision on the appeals by Prokam Enterprises Ltd. against the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission regarding licensing and marketing directives. The decision addresses the live issues in Appeal #N1908, and dismisses Appeal #N2101 due to lack of an appealable decision.
-
Letter: Affleck Hrabinsky Burgoyne LLP to BCFIRB — B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission participation in supervisory review
Counsel for the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission submits a letter to BCFIRB regarding the supervisory review into allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity, clarifying the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission’s position and addressing claims made by Prokam.
-
Letter: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. to B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission — Request to issue a Class 1 producer license
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. requests that BCVMC issue Prokam a Class 1 license for the 2021-22 growing season, despite not growing regulated vegetables in the previous season. The letter discusses Prokam’s appeal to BCFIRB and plans for potato planting and marketing.