Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: Lilydale Co-operative Ltd. and 7 Growers v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to redirect chicken production under pre-existing contracts. The appellants challenged the Board’s authority and the manner of redirection, arguing it was arbitrary and fettered discretion. The decision was related to the policy of assurance of supply.
-
Preliminary decision: MJ Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appellant requested an adjournment of the appeal of BCCMB’s order to cease production and marketing until the Court of Appeal decides on a related case affecting the standard of review.
-
Preliminary decision: Lilydale Co-operative Ltd. and 7 Growers v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The decision addresses a preliminary issue of document production in appeal against the BCCMB’s decisions on product direction.
-
Decision: Lilydale Co-operative Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to implement Parts 7 and 8 of its General Orders, which assure supply to processors and regulate new entrants. Appellants argue against fixed market shares and for open contracting.
-
Procedural decision: Lilydale Foods Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This decision addresses the document disclosure issue of document production and witness lists in Lilydale Foods Ltd.’s appeal against the BCCMB’s decisions regarding grower payments.
-
Preliminary decision: K&R Poultry Ltd. (Farm Fed) v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appellant sought an extension to file an appeal and a stay of BCCMB’s decision to impose conditions of sale for broiler chicks. Intervenor status was also decided.
-
Procedural decision: British Columbia Chicken Growers’ Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Addresses procedural issues regarding the consolidation of appeals related to Parts 7 and 8 of the General Orders. The decision was related to the policy of assurance of supply and redirection of product.
-
Decision: Jay Bee Farm Ltd., Wilson d.b.a. Luck of the Draw Broiler Farm, and Vance Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s quota compliance decision to impose penalties for over-production under Interim Order 313. The decision was related to quota compliance and the New Grower Program.
-
Decision: Stanley v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s order decision to amend Regulation No. lM-127-1979. Appellant claimed discrimination against smaller chicken producers by allocating quotas that favour larger growers.
-
Procedural decision: Vance Poultry Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Request for a stay of the penalties imposed by BCCMB Order #313, pending the appeal hearing outcome.