Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: Smith v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding six thoroughbred horses in Mission due to conditions including inadequate shelter, deep mud, lack of food and water, and untreated medical issues such as muscular atrophy, rain scald, and hoof problems.
-
Decision: Andrusek v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding five dogs and five birds due to unsanitary living conditions, including exposure to feces, garbage, and high ammonia levels, and untreated medical issues such as flea infestations, matted fur and dental disease.
-
Preliminary decision: Edward v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Summary dismissal regarding late filing of an appeal. The appeal was dismissed as it was filed after the deadline, with no discretion for time extension.
-
Decision: Harris v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding one dog in Abbotsford due to conditions including physical abuse, malnourishment, and distress. The dog exhibited signs of anxiety, fear, and physical discomfort, and was observed being mistreated by the appellant.
-
Decision: BCFIRB — Implementation and compliance of Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs)
BCFIRB reviews the rationales from five commodity boards for not implementing Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) for biosecurity programs. BCFIRB rejects the rationales from the B.C. Turkey Marketing Board, B.C. Hog Marketing Commission, and B.C. Milk Marketing Board (BCMMB), and directs them to take further steps toward developing AMPs or justifying their positions.
-
Decision: Booker v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding one horse in Chilliwack due to conditions including being underweight, untreated parasite infestation, and overgrown hooves. The horse was kept with inadequate shelter and was at risk from being housed with a stallion.
-
Decision: McAnerin v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding two dogs in Baker Creek due to conditions including inadequate shelter, unsanitary living conditions, and neglect. The dogs were found in undersized crates with poor ventilation and had untreated medical issues such as overgrown nails and fleas.
-
Decision: Foulds v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 67 dogs and puppies, 27 horses, and 3 cats in Princeton due to conditions including inadequate food, water, shelter, unsanitary conditions, untreated medical issues, and malnutrition. The animals exhibited various health issues, and there was a history of past seizures by the BC SPCA.
-
Decision: Taboulinskaia v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding three dogs in Vancouver due to conditions including inadequate shelter, unsanitary living conditions, lack of food and water, and untreated medical issues such as overgrown nails and dental problems. The dogs exhibited aggressive behaviour and were kept in a small apartment with insufficient care.
-
Decision: K & M Farms v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision to not direct a processor to custom slaughter or primal cut turkeys for K & M Farms and to cancel the placement of poults. K & M Farms argued that the decision would harm its niche market for pasture-raised heavy hens. The decision was related to the Board’s management of turkey…