Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: BCFIRB — Implementation and compliance of Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs)
BCFIRB reviews the rationales from five commodity boards for not implementing Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) for biosecurity programs. BCFIRB rejects the rationales from the B.C. Turkey Marketing Board, B.C. Hog Marketing Commission, and B.C. Milk Marketing Board (BCMMB), and directs them to take further steps toward developing AMPs or justifying their positions.
-
Decision: Booker v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding one horse in Chilliwack due to conditions including being underweight, untreated parasite infestation, and overgrown hooves. The horse was kept with inadequate shelter and was at risk from being housed with a stallion.
-
Decision: McAnerin v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding two dogs in Baker Creek due to conditions including inadequate shelter, unsanitary living conditions, and neglect. The dogs were found in undersized crates with poor ventilation and had untreated medical issues such as overgrown nails and fleas.
-
Decision: Taboulinskaia v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding three dogs in Vancouver due to conditions including inadequate shelter, unsanitary living conditions, lack of food and water, and untreated medical issues such as overgrown nails and dental problems. The dogs exhibited aggressive behaviour and were kept in a small apartment with insufficient care.
-
Decision: K & M Farms v. British Columbia Turkey Marketing Board
Appeal of BCTMB’s decision to not direct a processor to custom slaughter or primal cut turkeys for K & M Farms and to cancel the placement of poults. K & M Farms argued that the decision would harm its niche market for pasture-raised heavy hens. The decision was related to the Board’s management of turkey…
-
Decision: Foulds v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 67 dogs and puppies, 27 horses, and 3 cats in Princeton due to conditions including inadequate food, water, shelter, unsanitary conditions, untreated medical issues, and malnutrition. The animals exhibited various health issues, and there was a history of past seizures by the BC SPCA.
-
Decision: Bingley and Ward v. Lang Vineyards
Complaint related to noise disturbance from a chiller on a neighbouring vineyard in the Naramata Bench.
-
Decision: E.M. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 17 cats, 1 dog, and 8 chickens in Duncan due to unsanitary living conditions, untreated medical issues including upper respiratory infections, roundworms and flea infestations, and malnutrition. The appellant had a history of past seizures by the BC SPCA.
-
Dismissal: CFP Marketing Corporation v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to summarily dismiss CFP’s application for agency status.
-
Decision: Jensen and Pearson v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure regarding 40 cats in Prince George due to conditions including unsanitary living environments, untreated medical issues such as severe respiratory infections, dental problems and feline immunodeficiency virus. The property was cluttered with debris, and the cats exhibited signs of distress and illness.