Type: Decision
-
Preliminary decision: G. Wool & Sons Farm v. Outlander Poultry Farms Ltd.
Complaint related to barn clean out timing, incinerator exhaust and odour, dust and noise from fans, and feed delivery timing at a poultry farm in Langley. The complaint was not referred to a hearing.
-
Decision: Westcreek Citizens Society and Others v. Vane Investments Ltd., and Vane
Complaint related to odour, manure management and water contamination at a duck farm in Aldergrove.
-
Preliminary decision: Westcreek Citizens Society v. Vane Investments Ltd.
Complaint related to disturbances from a duck farm in Aldergrove, including issues of affidavit evidence admissibility, document production from government ministries, and expert access to farm facilities.
-
Decision: Lacey v. Instant Lawns Turf Farm (1994) Limited d.b.a. Westcoast Instant Lawns
Complaint related to odours from composting operations at a turf farm in Delta.
-
Procedural decision: McAnerin v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Procedural decision regarding the timeliness of an appeal filing. The appeal was allowed to proceed as the appellant received the decision late due to lack of internet access in an isolated area.
-
Decision: Whaley Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to apply GEP rules to quota reallocated to Whaley Farms under the Regularization Program. Whaley Farms contested the application of the 10/10/10 and LIFO provisions, arguing it affected their ability to manage the quota. The decision was related to BCMMB’s Consolidated Order.
-
Preliminary decision: Complainants v. Vane Investments Ltd.
Complaint related to document disclosure and expert report timing concerning the operation of a duck farm in Aldergrove.
-
Decision: Townline Enterprises v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny agency status for marketing ‘mini’ hothouse cucumbers. Townline Enterprises sought exemption to market directly, citing concerns over Co-op’s marketing strategy. The decision was related to the marketing structure under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Decision: Woodrow v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to refuse renewal of a packing house licence for Woodrow Bros. Farms. The appellant contested the refusal based on alleged bias and financial strain due to transportation costs.
-
Dismissal: Rittenhouse Produce v. British Columbia Interior Vegetable Marketing Board
Appeal of BC Interior Vegetable Marketing Board’s decision to deny Rittenhouse Produce the right to market carrots as in previous years.