Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: BC Hot House Foods Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny adjournment of a hearing on Global Greenhouse Produce Inc.’s agency application. BC Hot House Foods Inc. argued inadequate notice and preparation time regarding competition concerns with Global. The decision was related to the procedural handling of agency applications under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Decision: James v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny the production of On-Farm Food Safety Reports. James sought exemption from pooling, arguing the reports were relevant to product quality and pricing. The decision was related to the pooling of sales and agency fee structure.
-
Decision: V.I.P. Produce Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to grant temporary authority to Rage’s Farms Ltd. and recommend agency designation to VIFP. V.I.P. Produce Ltd. raised issues regarding procedural integrity and agency designation. The decision was related to the agency designation and marketing of regulated vegetables on Vancouver Island.
-
Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s jurisdiction decision to regulate export production. BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, LP challenged the BCVMC’s authority under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act and NAFTA implications. The decision was related to the marketing of vegetables in export trade.
-
Decision: V.I.P Produce Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to grant conditional agency status to VIFP in association with BC Fresh. VIP and IVCA contested the decision, arguing for a single agency on Vancouver Island and citing procedural defects. The decision was related to the agency designation and governance issues within the Vancouver Island vegetable industry.
-
Decision: Vaneck v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny a permit to grow chicken. The appellant argued he should be treated as a separate legal entity and that the decision hindered innovation and market development. The decision was related to the BCCMB’s General Orders, specifically Part 50.
-
Decision: B.C. Food Processors Association v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to settle the terms of the 1986 Broccoli and Cauliflower contracts, specifically regarding price and payment. B.C. Food Processors Association challenged the adherence to the Marketing Order and Negotiation Policy. The decision was related to the Marketing Order and Commission Crop Negotiation Policy.
-
Decision: Supervisory review of the Vancouver Island chicken industry
BCFIRB conducted a supervisory review of the Vancouver Island chicken industry to assess the feasibility of supporting a new processing plant proposed by Island Pride Poultry Processors Ltd. The review concluded that regulatory support for the plant is not justified due to economic challenges and the lack of a compelling long-term plan.
-
Decision: Van Herk v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s quota revocation decision to cancel the appellant’s quota and producer licence under the Graduated Entry Program. Central issues were whether the appellants were “actively engaged” in milk production and whether the Board’s process created procedural unfairness and bias concerns.
-
Decision: Truong Mushroom Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Mushroom Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMuMB’s decision to limit Truong Mushroom Farm Ltd.’s production to 100,000 lbs. of mushrooms per month. The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of BCMuMB to enact an order limiting production and argued for an exemption based on existing contracts. The decision was related to the September 4, 1997 Order of BCMuMB.