Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: Elkview Enterprises Ltd. v. B.C. Egg Marketing Board
BCFIRB dismisses Elkview Enterprises Ltd.’s appeal against BCEMB’s decision regarding the amendment of its Temporary Restricted Licence Quota permit. The decision emphasized the temporary nature of the permit and the need for Elkview to acquire quota.
-
Preliminary decision: Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
The appeal by Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. regarding the BCEMB’s lack of response to a letter about the enriched cage policy was dismissed. The appellant was not aggrieved by an order or decision, as required for an appeal under the Natural Products Marketing (B.C.) Act. The filing fee was returned.
-
Decision: Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to mandate enriched cage systems and other housing standards. Eggstraordinary Poultry Ltd. sought an extension for filing the appeal beyond the 30-day limit, citing ongoing discussions and lack of response as reasons. The decision was related to the New Hen Housing Policy.
-
Decision: Droogendyk Hothouses Inc. v. B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission
BCFIRB dismisses Droogendyk Hothouses Inc.’s appeal against BCVMC’s decision to deny a producer-shipper license, citing alignment with sound marketing policy and insufficient evidence of special circumstances.
-
Interim decision summary: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Summary of an interim decision addressing the scope of the BCCMB’s statutory obligation to produce documents in an appeal of 2000 regulatory changes tied to the National Allocation Agreement.
-
Early Dispute Resolution Checklist
A general checklist for parties involved in a dispute, encouraging them to consider early dispute resolution (like negotiation or mediation) before proceeding with a formal tribunal hearing.
-
Decision summary: Lilydale and 7 Growers v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Summary of the appeal of BCCMB’s decision to implement Parts 7 and 8 of its General Orders, which assure supply to processors and regulate new entrants. Appellants argue against fixed market shares and for open contracting.
-
Decision summary: Rossdown Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Summary of appeal of BCCMB’s decision to not assist Rossdown Farms Ltd. in maintaining an eight-week home schedule and directing product. The decision was related to the Board’s authority and the Competition Act.
-
Decision summary: Lilydale Co-operative and “7 Growers” et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Summary of appeal of BCCMB’s decision to redirect chicken production under pre-existing contracts. The appellants challenged the Board’s authority and the manner of redirection, arguing it was arbitrary and fettered discretion. The decision was related to the policy of assurance of supply.
-
Decision: Hopcott and Middleton v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMB’s decision to adjust marketing allocations. The appellants challenged the Cranberry Board’s failure to implement the BCMB’s directive to increase their allocations.