Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: Stanley v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s order decision to amend Regulation No. lM-127-1979. Appellant claimed discrimination against smaller chicken producers by allocating quotas that favour larger growers.
-
Decision: Krahn and Reitsema v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decisions regarding transitional quota as outlined in Order 320. Appellants appealed the denial of transitional quota related to a farm purchase and in a quota purchase.
-
Decision: Flockstra v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny additional roaster quota issuance under Regulation No. 1 M-162-1981.
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal concerning a stay application of the new August 15, 2000 BCCMB regulations, specifically challenging revisions to the Export Program under Part 25.
-
Interim decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
This procedural decision addresses the adjournment application by Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. and others regarding their appeal against the BCCMB’s August 15, 2000, regulations.
-
Interim Decision: Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s interim order #002 decision to set production allocation for period A-36. Appellants argue the production levels are too high and create confusion under new regulations.
-
Preliminary decision: BC Chicken Growers Association v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The BC Chicken Growers Association sought a stay of the BCCMB’s decision to remove the over-marketing levy for period A-53.
-
Decision: Fairline Developments (1992) Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision regarding payment for specialty chicken products rendered during the Avian Influenza outbreak. Fairline Developments contested the compensation amount, seeking full market value for specialty products. The decision was related to the BCCMB’s compensation policy for rendered products.
-
Decision: Friesen and Fehr v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s policy decision to implement rules affecting permit terms, corporate ownership, and export issues. Appellants challenged the restrictions on permit growth, transferability, and export limitations under the August 2000 policy rules, which were related to the New Entrant, Niche Market, and Specialty Program.
-
Decision: Farmcrest Foods Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of BCCMB’s decision to deny Farmcrest Foods Ltd.’s request to increase its specialty permit from 5,000 to 10,000 birds per week to meet processing demands and maintain market viability. The decision was related to the New Entrant, Niche Market and Specialty Program policy.