Industry: Vegetable
-
Letter: BCFIRB to B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission — Extension of member terms
BCFIRB acknowledges the BCVMC’s decision to extend member terms pending the completion of the 2022 elections. BCFIRB advises the Commission to seek legal advice regarding the authority to extend terms beyond May 31, 2022, as it may involve election provisions in the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act Regulations.
-
Submission: BCVMC to BCFIRB — Update on CFP agency application
This letter is the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission’s formal response to a request from BCFIRB (dated March 11, 2022) for a status update on the CFP agency application.
-
Letter: Affleck Hrabinsky Burgoyne LLP to BCFIRB — B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission response to requests for document production
Counsel for the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission provides documents in response to requests related to the supervisory review into allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity.
-
Ruling: Hearing continuation
BCFIRB issues a ruling on the continuation and scheduling of the supervisory review hearing, and addresses proposals for time limits on cross-examination and applications for witness testimony and document production by MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc.
-
Letter: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Re: Scope of Terms of Reference for supervisory review
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. refutes MPL’s interpretation of the “Allegations of Bad Faith” supervisory review, arguing the scope is limited to the specific Terms of Reference, not broad governance objectives.
-
Letter: DLA Piper (Canada) LLP to BCFIRB — Response to hearing counsel submissions
Counsel for Bajwa Farms Ltd. responds to hearing counsel’s submissions, expressing concerns about proposed time limits for cross examinations during the supervisory review hearing.
-
Letter: Dentons Canada LLP to BCFIRB — Response to hearing counsel submissions
Counsel for MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. responds to hearing counsel’s submissions, addressing document production, evidence relevance, and the continuation of the supervisory review hearing.
-
Submission: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Support for proposed hearing schedule
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. responds to BCFIRB’s March 11 letter, supporting Hearing Counsel’s proposed schedule to conclude the “Allegations of Bad Faith” supervisory review.
-
Letter: Hunter Litigation Chambers to BCFIRB — Response to hearing counsel’s recommendation on cross-examination limits
Counsel for Prokam Enterprises Ltd. responds to BCFIRB regarding hearing counsel’s recommendation to limit cross-examination rights during the supervisory review of allegations involving Prokam and MPL.
-
Letter: McEwan Partners to BCFIRB — Response to hearing counsel submissions
Counsel for B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission members responds to hearing counsel’s submissions, addressing procedural fairness and the need to enforce hearing schedules.