Type: Decision
-
Decision: Gemser Bros Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to reduce manufactured milk quota. Gemser Bros Farm Ltd. challenged the reduction communicated in a letter dated January 11, 1995.
-
Decision: Janmaat v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision regarding the refund of over quota levies for the dairy year 1989-1990. The decision was related to the jurisdiction of the British Columbia Marketing Board to hear the appeal.
-
Decision: Hurford v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny an exemption from section 7.01(a) of the Milk Market Sharing Order 28. The appellant argued that a catastrophe caused by nocardial mastitis, linked to a dry cow antibiotic, led to reduced milk production. The decision was related to the Milk Market Sharing Order.
-
Decision: Foremost Foods Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMB’s decision regarding an application for costs by the BCMMB. The appellant, Foremost Foods Ltd., contested the costs related to a previous decision on freight charges.
-
Decision: Houweling v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny a reduction in the fluid milk quota transfer assessment for Houweling. Houweling argued the decision was unfair and financially detrimental, as he did not enter the industry under the Graduated Entry Program. The decision was related to the Quota Transfer Assessment Policy.
-
Decision: Smith and Ruby v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to cancel quota effective October 1, 1997. The appeal arose in the context of a matrimonial dispute, with Smith acting as Receiver/Manager for Risacca Livestock and Genetics Ltd. The decision was related to the cancellation of milk production quota under the Consolidated Order.
-
Decision: Coates v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny the request to produce organic milk. Coates sought recognition to produce organic milk under the existing supply management system, citing higher production costs and lack of quota. The decision was related to the BCMMB Regulation.
-
Decision: Bifano Farms et al. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to establish a mandatory quota exchange program. Appellants argued the decision was unnecessary, economically unsound, and lacked administrative fairness. The decision was related to the establishment of a quota exchange program under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Interim Decision: Bulkley Valley Milk Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
The British Columbia Marketing Board issued an interim order allowing Bulkley Valley Milk Ltd. to continue receiving milk shipments pending the resolution of their appeal against decisions by the BCMMB. The order is in effect until the appeal is heard and decided.
-
Decision: Alberni Valley Dairymen v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision regarding the filing within the 30-day statutory time limit. The issue was whether there were special circumstances to warrant an extension.