Category: Regulated marketing appeal
-
Decision: Jacobsen v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision on raw milk hauling rates for Jacobsen’s proposed farm. Jacobsen contested the freight rate calculation and sought discretionary relief or amendment to the Consolidated Order. The decision was related to the BCMMB’s transportation regulations and milk transportation rates.
-
Decision: Island Farms Dairies Co-op Association v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision concerning an increase in the vendor marketing costs and losses levy. Island Farms Dairies Co-op Association challenges the procedural fairness and evidentiary requirements related to the levy. The decision was related to the policy appeal process.
-
Decision: Golden Eagle Ranch Inc. v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board
Appeal of British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board’s decision to grant approval to plant only 10 acres of cranberries instead of the requested 260 acres.
-
Interim Decision: Island Farms Dairies Co-op Association v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
The appeal concerns the BCMMB’s decision to increase the vendor marketing costs and losses levy. The BCFIRB has suspended the implementation of the levy increase for 60 days to allow for consultations and further action by the BCMMB. The decision addresses procedural issues related to the suspension and potential outcomes if the appeal proceeds.
-
Procedural decision: Island Farms Dairies Co-op Association v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to increase the Marketing Costs and Losses Levy by $1.96/HL. Island Farms Dairies Co-op Association challenges the levy increase, citing existing federal and provincial compensation programs and improved cull cow prices.
-
Decision: Intercontinental Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission
The appeal concerns whether the BCHMC engaged in price fixing. Preliminary objections addressed include the timeliness of the Notice of Appeal and the validity of a supplementary Notice of Appeal. The decision relates to the BCHMC’s jurisdiction to propose a pricing formula for hogs under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Decision: Fletcher’s Fine Foods Ltd. and Britco Export Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCHMC’s decision to uphold the Respondent’s letter dated June 29, 1992. The Appellants contested the decision related to hog marketing orders. The decision was related to the allocation of British Columbia produced hogs for the Chinatown “hot hog market.”
-
Decision: Golden Eagle Ranch Inc. v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board
Appeal of British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board’s decision to grant approval to plant only 10 acres of cranberries instead of the requested 260 acres.
-
Decision: Fletcher’s Ltd. and Britco Export Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCHMC’s decision to impose a differential levy under Order 1/84.
-
Preliminary decision: Fletcher’s Fine Foods Ltd. and Britco Export Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission
Appellants requested an interim stay of the BCHMC’s decision to deny them access to purchase B.C. hogs.