Type: Decision
-
Decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCCMB’s March 12, 2003, decision to approve Rossdown Farms Ltd.’s custom kill arrangement. The BCCMB is directed to develop a comprehensive new entrant program for processors.
-
Decision: Northern Interior Dairyman’s Association and Mainland Dairymen’s Association v. BCMMB — Freight Rate Dispute
The BCFIRB ordered the BCMMB to implement a total pooling system across eight provincial zones. BCFIRB reviewed the contested $2.50 per HL freight rate cap and concluded it aligns with sound marketing policy.
-
Procedural decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of BC v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
The B.C. Marketing Board (BCMB) denies the Primary Poultry Processors Association of BC’s application for a stay of the BCCMB’s March 12, 2003 decision approving Rossdown Farms Ltd.’s custom killing arrangement.
-
Decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Reasoning for appeal decision in appeal of the BCCMB’s March 12, 2003, decision to approve Rossdown Farms Ltd.’s custom kill arrangement. The BCCMB is directed to develop a comprehensive new entrant program for processors.
-
Decision: Primary Poultry Processors Association of B.C. v. B.C. Chicken Marketing Board
BCFIRB dismissed the PPPABC’s appeal against BCCMB’s Pricing Orders #077 and #078, which set the live chicken price for periods A-86 and A-87. The decision addressed procedural fairness and the pricing process.
-
Decision: Peniuk v. Michell
Complaint related to odour, noise, vibration, and unsightliness from a composting operation in Central Saanich.
-
Decision summary: Ponich Poultry Farm v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Summary of appeal of BCCMB’s refusal to renew two specialty permits for 1000 birds each under the new entrant and specialty program.
-
Decision: Pottruff v. British Columbia Egg Marketing Board
Appeal of BCEMB’s decision to deny a Chick/Pullet Placement Permit (CPP) application. The appellants argued that BCEMB lacked authority to regulate chicks under 19 weeks, failed to provide reasons, and fettered its discretion. The decision was related to BCEMB’s authority and biosecurity regulations.
-
Decision: Parker v. Maciel
Complaint related to noise from a propane cannon used for bird control at a cherry orchard in Osoyoos.
-
Decision: Parkinson v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 11 cats and 7 dogs in Mission due to conditions including unsanitary living conditions, inadequate nutrition, untreated medical issues such as dental disease and ingrown nails, and excessive ammonia levels affecting the animals’ health.